Syne Wrote:this level of election "irregularities [would be unprecedented]
Do you have full and accurate knowledge of past election irregularities to compare with your full and accurate knowledge of recent irregularities?
Basically, are you reporting a fact or reporting an unsubstantiated belief as though it were fact?
Well look at that... PA appellate court is siding with Trump regarding voter deadlines. O..o
(Nov 12, 2020 09:09 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]Meanwhile, Biden wins Arizona:
https://www.businessinsider.com/arizona-...vg-thZsTwc
What part of "projected to win" do you not comprehend? Ever hear about this thing called certifying the votes? No, just ignorance all around?
(Nov 12, 2020 09:31 PM)confused2 Wrote: [ -> ]Syne Wrote:this level of election "irregularities [would be unprecedented]
Do you have full and accurate knowledge of past election irregularities to compare with your full and accurate knowledge of recent irregularities?
Basically, are you reporting a fact or reporting an unsubstantiated belief as though it were fact?
Knowledge need not be "full and accurate" to know when the unprecedented happens. You can know a local storm was unprecedented by the damage you see outside your door, even when you don't know the accurate dollar figure of damage done.
It is a fact that there were more irregularities, whether honest errors or fraudulent, if only due to the unprecedentedly volume of early and mail-in voting due to Covid.
(Nov 12, 2020 11:49 PM)Leigha Wrote: [ -> ]Well look at that... PA appellate court is siding with Trump regarding voter deadlines. O..o
They're reporting that only accounts for 2,100 ballots. But no doubt, that's not the only legal action in PA.