(Jun 25, 2017 07:45 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:Bare assertions without supporting arguments give no one any substantial reason for your dismissal.
So we can only assume that you think they're wrong because they do not espouse the opinions you think blacks who know their place should.
That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. You can assume I think they're wrong because they are in fact wrong and not for any other reason.
Yet you've arduously avoided any of the actual evidence for their opinions...meaning this excuse is just a cop-out for your subconscious racism.
The most obvious evidence is their personal experience living in those communities...where they face regular threat of being victimized by the same blacks who do support BLM...to the effect of things like de-policing their crime-ridden neighborhoods.
Your apparent dearth of concern for innocent children living in fear of random stray bullets just illustrates your racist callousness.
Quote:Quote:No, again you ignore the article showing they're stopped more because they speed more. Speeding is a crime, and it does contribute to more frequent interactions with police. But apparently, you can't think beyond leftist talking points. Even when it's clearly spelled out for you.
Speeding isn't a crime the last time I checked.
LOL!!!!! 
In most states, a speeding violation is a criminal offense, or, at the very least, a "quasi-criminal offense," that is, an act that can be punished by the courts as though it is a crime.
In either event, some standards that apply to purely criminal matters usually apply to prosecutions for speeding.
- http://criminal.lawyers.com/traffic-viol...ation.html
You speed enough and you will lose your license. And if you drive without a license you could end up in jail.
In ordinary language, a crime is an unlawful act punishable by a state or other authority. The term "crime" does not, in modern criminal law, have any simple and universally accepted definition, though statutory definitions have been provided for certain purposes. The most popular view is that crime is a category created by law; in other words, something is a crime if declared as such by the relevant and applicable law. One proposed definition is that a crime or offence (or criminal offence) is an act harmful not only to some individual but also to a community, society or the state ("a public wrong"). Such acts are forbidden and punishable by law.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime
Speeding is forbidden and punishable by law.
Do you even drive? O_o
Quote:Should we start going into jay walking infractions and late returned library books for blacks next? What's your problem with black people?
What's your problem with accepting simple facts? O_o
Oh right, they don't allow you to assuage your white guilt...because you
know you're racist.
Quote:If you actually read the article you quoted it said that whole study on blacks in New Jersey speeding more is in question. Read the article!
"Mark Posner, a Justice Department lawyer who asked that the findings be withheld, said he was concerned that the results had been skewed by factors such as weather, camera placement and glare on windshields.
"Based on the questions we have identified, it may well be that the results reported in the report are wrong or unreliable," Mr. Posner said in a letter to New Jersey officials."
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2002...229-2114r/
In the southern segment of the turnpike, where the speed limit is 65 m.p.h., 2.7 percent of black drivers were speeders, compared with 1.4 percent of white drivers. Among drivers going faster than 90 m.p.h., the disparity was even greater.
By contrast, blacks were no more likely to speed than whites when the limit was 55 m.p.h. In those geographical segments of the turnpike, 13.1 percent of black drivers were speeders, compared with 13.5 percent of white drivers.
Those results startled officials in the state attorney general's office, who had assumed that the radar study would bolster their case that profiling was widespread. Instead, the study concluded that blacks make up 16 percent of the drivers on the turnpike and 25 percent of the speeders in the 65 m.p.h. zones, where complaints of profiling have been most common.
- http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/21/nyregi...ersey.html
Yeah, the DOJ was looking for racial profiling, so who's surprised their lawyers would want to suppress evidence that contradicts their stated goal?
Quote:Quote:Sure, buddy. You tell me that after you've run a successful business and dealt with a significant pattern of problematic employees.
So black people are more "problematic" for their employers? What stats do you have for that? Ofcourse "problematic" is an endlessly tweekable adjective that can mean just about anything. Especially when the employer is a racist prick.
New research on hiring bias found resumes bearing names traditionally held by blacks and Hispanics are just as likely to lead to callbacks and job interviews as those bearing white-sounding names.
The findings, announced last week by the University of Missouri, diverge from the results of a famous study from more than a decade ago that found Lakishas and Jamals were far less likely to get job interviews than Emilys and Gregs.
- http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/c...story.html
Another discouraging finding was that all minority groups were more likely to quit a workplace in which a greater proportion of employees were white, suggesting that diversity is difficult to sustain.
- http://www.multiculturaladvantage.com/re...rnover.asp
Quote:Quote:Really? Bare assertions that you, as a white guy, would fair equally well in poor black and white communities?
That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
Plenty of evidence of more violent crime committed by blacks against whites than vice versa. Alas, if you were only intellectually honest enough to bother looking.
The statistics show that the 500 killings of white people attributed to blacks last year were the most since black perpetrators were determined to be responsible for the homicides of 504 white people nationwide in 2008. Last year's total was up 12 percent from the 446 recorded in 2014 and 22 percent from the 409 seen in 2013, a year that saw the lowest total this century and one that capped seven years of general declines in black-on-white homicides. Prior to that, 2006 saw the most black-on-white killings since 2001, with 573.
The 229 black lives taken by white killers last year, however, marked an even larger leap from 2014, jumping more than 22 percent from the 187 black victims killed by whites that year, which was the second-lowest total since 2001. The tally was last exceeded in 2008, when 230 blacks were slain by whites. The highest total in the last 15 years came in 2007, when 245 black people were killed by whites.
- https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/201...he-numbers
Quote:Quote:No, police assume blacks are more dangerous...because statistically they are. Rolleyes
Has nothing to do with anger.
Studies showing black people are more "dangerous" than other races? How do you define "dangerous"? Should black people be fined for being more "dangerous" than white people?
Higher rate of violent crime = more dangerous
Duh.
Who said ANYTHING about fining anyone? O_o
Quote:Quote:Apparently you can add "ubiquitous" to the list of common English words you don't understand
Incidents of black women going missing aren't anywhere near as ubiquitous as fender benders. Hence your racist dismissal of it in terms importance.
Nope, it's only in your own assumption are that of equal importance...which is telling.
I never dismissed the vast difference in importance, other that your lazy straw man that I ever made any such comparison.
Who assumes all black men are angry? 