Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

I didn't say you cared. I said, for being a supposed zealot, I'm slacking a lot. 9_9
You got me beat, hands down.

Quote:I didn't say you cared. I said, for being a supposed zealot, I'm slacking a lot. 9_9
You got me beat, hands down.

Not really..This is like your 10th post in this thread about how people aren't really seeing Saskwatch because "science" allegedly says all eyewitnesses are so reliable. That seems a rather desperate and zealous pitch to me.

Yeah, I've pointed out the science of eyewitnesses.
I haven't said anything about BF other than you were claiming "that BF may be supernatural."

I didn't say anything approaching "people aren't really seeing Saskwatch[sic]."
Your paranoid zealotry made that up.

I guess I'm work smarter, not harder. I just have to question eyewitness reliability and you make up the rest of the "debunking" yourself.

Quote:I didn't say anything approaching "people aren't really seeing Saskwatch[sic]."
Your paranoid zealotry made that up.

Backpedaling as usual. I said we have many eyewitness accounts of Bigfoot disappearing and going into portals of light. That's eyewitnesses again. If you don't doubt eyewitnesses in the case of the sightings, then you have no reason to doubt the eyewitnesses of his disappearance either. Unless you want to expose your own selective bias. Hey, here's an idea! Why don't you watch the film? It's not gonna hurt you.