Junk Science
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
Announcements
T
- High time to rethink how we define scientific expertise and authority (0 Replies)
- A counter to the American Academy of Pediatrics hit piece on GMOs (0 Replies)
- Educational testing and the war on reality & common sense (0 Replies)
- Just bribe everyone -- it's only scientific record + Climate science gatekeeping (0 Replies)
- The campaign to discredit lab-grown meat + Young trust science less than older people (0 Replies)
- A good journal breaks bad: AAP spreads misinformation about glyphosate (0 Replies)
- Scientific American proposes policing the language of astronomy (1 Reply)
- The false link between climate change and mass migration (0 Replies)
- 10,000 research papers retracted in 2023 (0 Replies)
- Trigger warnings: discredited but not discarded (0 Replies)
- Occam's razor the only feature that differentiates science from pseudoscience? (3 Replies)
- Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists (0 Replies)
- Surge in number of ‘extremely productive’ authors concerns scientists (0 Replies)
- Christopher Labos: Placebo effect is real, and complicated (1 Reply)
- What's behind the holiday-suicide myth + Truth & scientific consequences (1 Reply)
- Dinosaurs might be the reason we're not living to 200 years old (0 Replies)
- A 27,000-year-old pyramid? Controversy hits an extraordinary archaeological claim. (0 Replies)
- Why research fraud is getting worse + Trust in sci & vaccines still declining. Why? (0 Replies)
- University wholly ditches merit-based hiring, favoring gender, “looks”, & personality (4 Replies)
- What’s wrong with peer review? + No, TCM has not been vindicated by science (1 Reply)