Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Model predicts global threat of sinking land will affect 635 million people worldwide

#1
C C Offline
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/...122820.php

RELEASE: A new analysis suggests that, by 2040, 19% of the world's population - accounting for 21% of the global Gross Domestic Product - will be impacted by subsidence, the sinking of the ground's surface, a phenomenon often caused by human activities such as groundwater removal, and by natural causes as well. The results, reported in a Policy Forum, represent "a key first step toward formulating effective land-subsidence policies that are lacking in most countries worldwide," the authors say.

Gerardo Herrera Garcia et al. performed a large-scale literature review that revealed that during the past century, land subsidence due to groundwater depletion occurred at 200 locations in 34 countries. During the next decades, factors including global population and economic growth, exacerbated by droughts, will probably increase land subsidence occurrence and related damages or impacts, they say. Policies that implement subsidence modeling in exposed areas, constant monitoring of high-risk areas, damage evaluation, and cost-effective countermeasures could help reduce the impacts of subsidence where it will hit hardest - namely, areas with increased population density, high groundwater demand, and irrigated areas suffering water stress.

Towards informing such policies, the authors developed a model by combining spatial and statistical analyses that identified an area's subsidence susceptibility based on factors like flooding and groundwater depletion caused by human activities. Comparing their model to independent validation datasets revealed it was 94% capable of distinguishing between subsidence and non-subsidence areas. Notably, the model also revealed that most of the 635 million inhabitants in subsistence-susceptible areas are located in Asia, with a total exposed GDP of $9.78 trillion. While the model does not consider existing mitigation measures, potentially resulting in overestimates of subsidence exposure, their results still represent a step forward to effective policies, Herrera et al. say.
Reply
#2
Zinjanthropos Offline
Do we add this model to a long list of dire climate related predictions that haven’t materialized?
Reply
#3
Syne Offline
(Jan 1, 2021 09:48 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: Do we add this model prediction to a long list of dire climate related predictions that haven’t materialized?

Yep. It's an ever-moving goalpost.
Reply
#4
Zinjanthropos Offline
(Jan 1, 2021 09:49 PM)Syne Wrote:
(Jan 1, 2021 09:48 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: Do we add this model prediction to a long list of dire climate related predictions that haven’t materialized?

Yep. It's an ever-moving goalpost.

I’m not denying climate is changing but were experts expecting it to never change? Seems absurd. Even if there wasn’t a single CO2 molecule added in the last 100 years I would not expect the climate to remain static. Hard to believe a thousand years ago Greenland had farming. 

When ice sheets melt does it open up more land?
Reply
#5
Syne Offline
(Jan 1, 2021 10:34 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: I’m not denying climate is changing but were experts expecting it to never change? Seems absurd. Even if there wasn’t a single CO2 molecule added in the last 100 years I would not expect the climate to remain static. Hard to believe a thousand years ago Greenland had farming. 

When ice sheets melt does it open up more land?

They only changed the term to "climate change" after so many predictions of global warming and cooling failed to materialize. "Climate change" is slippery enough to fit any prediction at all. But it's also a completely trivial term, because, as you point out, the climate has always and will always be changing. So everyone pretty much agrees that climate change occurs. We just don't agree that the predictions mean the end of the world is nigh.
Reply
#6
Yazata Offline
Here in California, land subsidence is a real thing. Large parts of the big Central Valley have experienced it to varying degrees.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Va...subsidence

But that being said, global warming doesn't have a whole lot to do with it. It's mostly the result of more and more intensive agriculture that uses well water faster than it can be replenished. That and the fact that the water runoff from the mountains that used to feed the central valley aquifers has been diverted to supply burgeoning urban populations.

While it's cracked highways and the water aqueducts, subsidence hasn't really impacted people's lives that much. What does impact lives is the water shortages. That's less the result of global warming than it is due to California's population exploding from 20 million to 40 million over the last generation. I expect that it will only get worse.
Reply
#7
C C Offline
(Jan 2, 2021 12:50 AM)Yazata Wrote: Here in California, land subsidence is a real thing. Large parts of the big Central Valley have experienced it to varying degrees.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Va...subsidence

But that being said, global warming doesn't have a whole lot to do with it. [...]


In fact (just to spotlight this odd topic deviation at the very start), there is no mention of climate change in the brief article or the summary of the paper. Multiple instances of the word "global" appear but not combined with "warming".
Reply
#8
Zinjanthropos Offline
(Jan 2, 2021 01:17 AM)C C Wrote:
(Jan 2, 2021 12:50 AM)Yazata Wrote: Here in California, land subsidence is a real thing. Large parts of the big Central Valley have experienced it to varying degrees.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Va...subsidence

But that being said, global warming doesn't have a whole lot to do with it. [...]


In fact (just to spotlight this odd topic deviation at the very start), there is no mention of climate change in the brief article or the summary of the paper. Multiple instances of the word "global" appear but not combined with "warming".

Is the problem subterranean water sources aren’t being replenished fast enough?

Why not tow gigantic icebergs to Calif coast or send huge water container ships to gather water/ice from an existing iceberg? Big Grin
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article The hidden threat from rising coastal groundwater C C 0 147 Feb 9, 2024 03:34 AM
Last Post: C C
  Bering Land Bridge formed surprisingly late during last ice age, study finds C C 0 76 Dec 29, 2022 06:29 PM
Last Post: C C
  Europe's submerged menace + Sea levels affect volcanic island eruptions + Doggerland C C 0 89 Aug 2, 2021 08:18 PM
Last Post: C C
  Mexico City’s surprising crisis: the city is sinking C C 0 78 May 30, 2021 02:33 AM
Last Post: C C
  Did complex landscapes make land animals smart? + Why volcanoes & aliens go together C C 0 129 Jun 20, 2020 08:47 PM
Last Post: C C
  Portland State researcher develops new model to accurately date historic earthquakes C C 0 175 May 14, 2020 08:56 PM
Last Post: C C
  “The larch … the larch” + Carbon-14 spiked worldwide over 1200 years ago C C 0 134 Apr 3, 2020 10:18 PM
Last Post: C C
  Icy Worlds Like Europa & Enceladus Might Actually be too Soft to Land On C C 2 461 Feb 5, 2018 08:50 PM
Last Post: C C
  Ancient Earth as a model for studying hazy exoplanets C C 0 350 Feb 10, 2017 03:30 AM
Last Post: C C
  Why the magnetic poles could be about to swap places -- and how it could affect us C C 6 1,108 Feb 6, 2017 01:31 PM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)