Sexual sadist priest + Jail those Christians + Sikh hate crime rises + Pak man kills

[C C]

(UK) 'Sexual sadist' priest locked boy in crypt and sexually touched him during six-year campaign of abuse
https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/c...y-19405530

---

Pak man kills Christian woman after rejection
https://asianlite.com/asia-news/pak-man-...rejection/

---

If you think we're exaggerating just look to Norway
https://www.christiantoday.com/article/i...136021.htm

INTRO: For more than 15 years, I have been saying that those who came out of the closet would want to put us in the closet, meaning that gay activists calling for "equality" and "tolerance" would want to silence dissenting voices. About 10 years ago, a Christian attorney said to me, "Mike, take that one step farther. Those who were once put in jail will want to put us in jail."

When I repeated his comment on Christian TV, I was widely ridiculed by the left. "No one wants to put people like you in jail!" That tune quickly changed when, in 2015 Kim Davis, a county clerk in Kentucky, was jailed for refusing to follow a court order and issue a marriage certificate for a same-sex couple.

Many on the left applauded her arrest, thrilled that she was in jail and hoping she would not get out anytime soon. And on social media, comments were completely unhinged, like this one: "Kim Davis, by Virtue of defying the Constitution and the Supreme Court is NO BETTER than those men who conceived, executed, and plotted those attacks on the World Trade Center and the pentagon on September 11. Granted, there haven't been any lives lost in the wake of Mrs. Davis' shenanigans, the ideology of using her religious beliefs as justification to defile the Supreme Court and the Constitution make her a religious terrorist along the order of Osama bin Laden and ISIS."

[...] I could multiply other examples, not just from America but from other countries as well ... Now, "Norway Has Made Biphobic, Transphobic Speech Illegal." More specifically, "The penal code states that those who are guilty of hate speech face a fine or up to a year in jail for private comments, and a maximum of three years in jail for public remarks. Furthermore, those charged with violent crimes that are motivated by a victim's orientation or gender identity will receive harsher sentences."

So, a private comment deemed hateful to an LGBT person or persons could get you a one-year jail sentence. Make this comment in public, and you're looking at three years in jail, the same penalty for third-degree murder (meaning, by neglect) in Norway. You heard that right... (MORE)

---

Hate crimes against British Sikhs rise by 70% in just two years
https://metro.co.uk/2020/12/06/hate-crim...-13706537/

INTRO: Anti-Sikh hate crimes has risen by 70% in the last two years. Campaigners are calling for more funding and an official definition of the hate-crime. There were 202 anti-Sikh hate crimes in 2019-20, up from 117 in 2017-18, according to Home Office data.

The UK’s first female Sikh MP Preet Kaur Gill has said her community feels not enough is being done to protect them. ‘The community feels forgotten,’ she told Sky News. ‘There needs to be a definition, just like there is for antisemitism and Islamophobia, for anti-Sikh hate crimes.’

She said she has often been called the ‘P-word’ despite being a Sikh. She added: ‘This has become so normal for so many, especially my generation who grew up in schools.’

Although Sikhs are a minority in Britain, they are the largest religious group of Indians, but there is still no official definition for hate crimes against them... (MORE)

Sikh child attacked by schoolmates in UK is being investigated as a hate crime

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/OQDvTojDmaI

[Zinjanthropos]

Norwegian Christians.........Either edit the damn Bible or God goes to jail.

How is Google going to handle this? I think in Norway there might be a lot fewer religion based anti-gay pages to access today. Tip of the iceberg?

[C C]

[...] Tip of the iceberg?

Eventually, I expect even traditional vulgarities will be speech-policed again with penalties, like in the old days in certain public contexts. (There's the irony of some religious-based prudes perhaps welcoming that.)

The "F-word" is surely slighting asexual and celibate people, and virgins, in some manner.

Both "C-words" and related slang terms are disparaging the reproductive organs of specific body types. Human bodies should be venerated, no matter what particular form they take.

Aren't "SoB" and "bastard" (when directed at an individual) already taboo once more due to political correctness? (Never hear them in HBO shows.) One disparages a woman who has given birth and other privileges marriage status in a biased manner.

All physiological parts, fluids, and discharge substances should be respected equally. "A-hole" is demeaning to sphincters. "Sh--" is an abusive label for the product outputted by the lower GI tract.

Of course, intense revival of cracking down on profanity may only apply to usage by white people and possibly middle/upper class SE-Asians, Hispanics. Hip-hop lingo as a sub-cultural parlance of systemically persecuted population-groups may get an exemption.

[Zinjanthropos]

Sweetie Pie, Honey Bunny, Doll Face and other terms of endearment will be next.

Tattoo industry will need to be careful

This plant will be in the crosshairs also:
 https://www.amusingplanet.com/2013/05/ps...-most.html