Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

In science, questions matter a lot. Men are more likely than women to ask them.

#1
C C Offline
https://phys.org/news/2019-07-science-lo...women.html

EXCERPT: . . . A bit more than half of all doctoral degrees in the biomedical sciences are now earned by women. But if their growing numbers in STEM fields are to translate into meaningful scientific contributions, these women need their voices to be heard—in classrooms, at meetings and on conference daises. New research offers some surprising insight into an often overlooked variable in this equation. For a female scientist's voice to be heard, she must first decide to use it. That can mean standing up at a meeting and asking a question. And that's not happening as often as one might expect.

The study was published last month in the American Journal of Human Genetics. It culled data from several years' worth of genetics conferences and found that men were overrepresented among the questioners at scientific meetings and symposiums. Women, on the other hand, were coming up short. The study authors say there may be many explanations for women's reticence to speak up at professional conferences. But they also suggest that more documentation of the gender gap, and a wider awareness of its existence, would help rectify the imbalance.

After all, the problem isn't limited to the genetics field. Previous work has shown that women are underrepresented as speakers in a wide range of scientific disciplines, including microbiology, virology and evolutionary biology. "We're missing out" when the voices of women and minorities are not fully represented, Dr. Francis S. Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, said in an interview.

[...] The new research focusing on genetics conferences offers a nuanced profile of women's representation in one of science's most cutting-edge fields. About 45% of the roughly 8,000 geneticist who belong to the American Society of Human Genetics are women, and the work presented at annual conferences suggests that female geneticists are contributing heavily to their field. In nine of 14 sub-fields of genetics, the proportion of papers presented by women exceeded their overall representation in the society, the study authors found. But the pattern was different in the question-and-answer portion of the proceedings, where professional reputations are shaped and research agendas are advanced. The analysis of recordings made at four of the society's annual meetings revealed that men asked 65% of the questions posed to speakers.

Even in sessions where a majority of the audience members were women, men dominated the questioning. "When women are 70% of a room, they still asked only about 40% of the questions," said Natalie Telis, who led the study with Emily Glassberg while both were pursuing doctorates at Stanford University. Now working in the private sector, Telis reckons that an audience would need to be 80% to 90% women to assure that the question-asking would be split evenly between men and women.

[...] Consider this: At the opening session of the 2017 meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics, Telis presented some of her preliminary findings and touched off a broad discussion focusing on women's participation in question-and-answer sessions. In its wake, she and her co-authors detected a measurable difference. The proportion of questions asked by women following invited and plenary talks was similar to that seen in previous years. But the proportion of talks that were followed by zero questions from women fell from 51% to 30%.

Cummings, whose first-ever conference question was posed during that meeting, said that the new data certainly reflects her own experience. As she considered whether to stand and ask a question, she felt the weight of the audience's potential judgment. Over the years, she'd heard a few male colleagues ask questions that were silly or misinformed. But such a misstep didn't feel like an option for her. This was no occasion for bumbling or for wandering into unknown territory, she concluded.

Now she has some data to back up those impressions, and so do colleagues who may have been skeptical of the barriers that many women perceive. "People talk about this all the time," said Cummings, who is now a post-doctoral fellow at the Broad Institute in Cambridge, Mass. "But this is actually data. And that really speaks to scientists in the language they understand." (MORE - details)
Reply
#2
Syne Offline
Not surprising. Women are inherently less assertive than men.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why family businesses get more from women leaders C C 0 105 Jan 19, 2024 06:55 PM
Last Post: C C
  Female scholars more likely to be elected to prestigious US science societies C C 0 56 Feb 24, 2023 11:08 PM
Last Post: C C
  Food expiration dates don’t have much science behind them C C 0 84 Aug 8, 2022 08:18 PM
Last Post: C C
  Autistic individuals are more likely to be LGBTQ+ C C 1 73 Sep 20, 2021 08:52 PM
Last Post: Syne
  ‘If you alienate the public, blame them, point fingers at them, things fall apart’ C C 0 154 Oct 19, 2020 11:42 PM
Last Post: C C
  Flesh-eating worms: Maintaining the barrier, the perpetual battle against them C C 0 146 May 27, 2020 06:25 AM
Last Post: C C
  New study shows why women have to be likeable, and men don't C C 8 592 Feb 5, 2020 03:50 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Americans are smart about science: Educating them won’t solve political problems C C 1 370 Mar 30, 2019 04:04 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Girls Are More Engaged When “Doing Science” Rather Than “Being Scientists” C C 12 2,200 Feb 18, 2019 10:30 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Why it’s only science that can answer all the big questions C C 2 384 Aug 23, 2018 05:19 PM
Last Post: Syne



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)