7 bad science and health ideas that should die with 2018

#1
C C Offline
https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2...iment-juul

INTRO: If you’re a science enthusiast who has followed the news in 2018, you’ve probably noted a few moments when science got the shaft. In 2018 alone, there was the freeze on important HIV science involving fetal cell tissue, the defunding of Planned Parenthood, White House interference in an international breastfeeding resolution for women’s health, the elimination of a science adviser’s office at the Environmental Protection Agency, and all the rollbacks of environmental protections at EPA and Interior, backed by a White House trying to downplay two major climate science reports. Plus, Goop continues to thrive, and Dr. Oz became a White House health council adviser.

At the Vox science desk, we like to close each year with a list of ideas we think should die by January 1. For posterity, here’s our 2018 hit list. (See previous versions of this year-end list here and here.)

COVERED:

Myth 1: fighting climate change will destroy the economy

Myth 2: Juuling is cool

Myth 3: Neanderthals were more savage than us

Myth 4: the marshmallow test is a key test of future success and well-being

Myth 5: immigrants pose a disease risk to the US

Myth 6: mere exposure to other points of view reduces partisanship

Myth 7: the Stanford Prison Experiment shows how environments can bring out evil in people

MORE (details): https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2...iment-juul
Reply
#2
Syne Offline
#1: All proposed strategies to make a significant dent in climate change would destroy the economy, and no one has proposed one that would both have an appreciable effect without a huge negative economic impact.
#3: Ah, the myth of the "noble savage", driven by the ideological belief that man is inherently good and only modernity has corrupted us.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Zombie theories: why do so many false ideas stick around? C C 0 104 Jul 29, 2024 09:42 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article Partisan science is bad for society + Astrobiology: Rise & fall of a nascent science C C 0 85 Apr 12, 2023 04:38 PM
Last Post: C C
  Article Why race-based health care is bad medicine: from BiDil to kidney transplants C C 0 105 Mar 30, 2023 05:19 PM
Last Post: C C
  Hawthorn effect: one of the most influential social science studies is pretty bad C C 0 106 Feb 18, 2023 07:51 PM
Last Post: C C
  Open letter to all cranks + Why is bad science allowed in the courtrooms? C C 0 371 Oct 31, 2022 05:48 PM
Last Post: C C
  We’re incentivizing bad science + Science, scorn, & cynicism C C 0 297 Nov 5, 2019 01:57 AM
Last Post: C C
  Will sensitivity-fueled litigation end peer review? + Bad cannabis science C C 7 1,521 Nov 4, 2017 10:44 AM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn
  Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? C C 1 785 Aug 9, 2017 08:45 AM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn
  Inevitable evolution of bad science + The problem with science writing C C 1 488 Sep 23, 2016 07:01 PM
Last Post: Syne
  Evolutionary forces are causing a boom in bad science C C 1 537 Jul 15, 2016 04:35 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)