Scientists stumped by ribbon of light in the sky

#1
C C Offline
https://bigthink.com/robby-berman/scient...in-the-sky

EXCERPT: Those of us who follow science news had a good chuckle when news broke a while back about a mysterious sky phenomenon appearing in auroral and sub-auroral regions dubbed “Steve.” Well, “Steve” is actually “STEVE,” standing for “Strong Thermal Emission Velocity Enhancement,” and it’s no joke. What it is, on the other hand, is unknown. [...] The initial assumption was that STEVE was some flavor of aurora borealis, but a new study published in Geophysical Research Letters — the first serious examination at STEVE — finds that it’s not. Lead scientist of the new study Bea Gallardo-Lacourt says, “Our main conclusion is that STEVE is not an aurora. So right now, we know very little about it. And that’s the cool thing, because this has been known by photographers for decades. But for the scientists, it’s completely unknown.” She and her colleagues refer to the phenomenon as a “sky glow.”...

MORE: https://bigthink.com/robby-berman/scient...in-the-sky
Reply
#2
Ostronomos Offline
CC,

Are you ever gonna formulate a fuckin opinion on these subjects girl? I mean "Hello!"
Reply
#3
C C Offline
(Aug 26, 2018 08:15 PM)Ostronomos Wrote: CC, Are you ever gonna formulate a fuckin opinion on these subjects girl? I mean "Hello!"

This "problem" is not amenable to opinions / sentiments, canon, social theories, pet interpretative filters, and loose speculations mediated by ordinary language. It's not politics, religion, prescriptions for human behavior, science fiction, etc.

It is somewhat similar to the Pioneer anomaly that was eventually solved by accessing old data in antique storage formats and the tedious, brute technical analysis of such.

It's not the same territory as elusive "Why are there no signs of space alien civilizations?" or future "Why did the technological singularity not happen in 2030-2040?" type questions which are triggered by expectations that were themselves born from personal and group sentiments.

~
Reply
#4
Secular Sanity Offline
Do you know what I like about, C C. I never have to defend her. *BAM!*
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  "The sky has changed": Astronomers say SpaceX satellites are interfering C C 1 120 Jan 15, 2023 04:22 AM
Last Post: Yazata
  Hubble spots most distant single star ever, at distance of 28 billion light years C C 0 15 Mar 30, 2022 05:26 PM
Last Post: C C
  The Red Sky Paradox C C 0 41 Dec 29, 2021 03:12 AM
Last Post: C C
  Dancing ghosts’: a new, deeper scan of the sky throws up surprises for astronomers C C 0 32 Aug 5, 2021 10:06 PM
Last Post: C C
  Mars lake theory iced by alt answer + Light from behind a black hole + Charm meson C C 1 51 Jul 30, 2021 04:18 AM
Last Post: Syne
  Hints of twisted light offer clues to dark energy’s nature + Milky Way not static C C 0 96 Nov 27, 2020 03:58 AM
Last Post: C C
  Can We Make Light Go Faster? Zinjanthropos 1 94 Jul 21, 2020 03:47 PM
Last Post: C C
  Did you see the bright light in the sky? Secular Sanity 3 686 Dec 21, 2018 04:46 PM
Last Post: Secular Sanity
  Spectacular IFO (Identified Fllying Object) in Sky over Southern California Yazata 4 661 Dec 27, 2017 03:37 AM
Last Post: C C
  4 faster than light items + Inflatable dark matter + Falcon 9 topples during landing C C 0 759 Jan 19, 2016 07:05 AM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)