http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/2017111...-cultivate
holy crap !
50% unemployment rate ?!
thats scandalous ! (soo much for a capitalist democracy)
... moving on...
one thing i have noticed about these 'types' of people...
which seems to always be 'missed by many' when they talk about them...
which is quite odd because it seems to be quite important...
mostly, you have 2 super achievers who by chance & or unbelievably busy life style happen to have met each other.
while it may feel nice to bask in the glow of their awesomeness(if you think celebrity status is your thing, or money[mostly always involves money as super achievers tend to rise to the top])
these are the type of people, generally, that put around 3 times the work into the things they do.
Reminds me of The Rocks words "be the hardest working person in the room".
while being the hardest working person at that moment helps, it pays t keep in mind that they are also working twice as hard as the average person on the days you dont see them and while they are not in the room.
statistically the chances of 2 super achievers meeting & falling in love is fairly slim.
i guess this gives them a sense of fairytale status that many people like to fantasise about.
though the fairytale dream never involves the 70 hour weeks end to end for years that these type of people do.
Good statistics
Bad statistics
Random Chance
Low probability
High Probability
Meta-Data illusions ... ?
side note question.... Does Meta-Data make things seem more easy because you can see examples of it easily ?
is there any visualisation process ? possibly though those who are positively motivated by the opportunity to expereince positive encounters probably are going to seek out similar encounters.
the random chances that beat all the odds(keeping in mind these people have spent most of their lives beating the odds day in day by working 3 times as hard as the average person)...
[] Reminds me of a Girl from school. i did not know her as a friend, i was privy to the teachers confidante.
she had stamina and work ethic but failed to pick up the actual knowledge (probably a mix of allergys & visual/spacial cognitive plus a lack of alternate theory systems taught, possibly a mineral &/or vitamin deficiency etc).
All the teachers had a special off the books meeting about her because they did not know how to deal with marking her school reports.
none of them wanted to give her a bad mark, but she simply couold not pass the base 50% standard to hand the teachers the ability to simply move her forward.
1 teacher was effectively depressed by the situation for weeks.(real teachers really care)
all the national education rules said she had to be held back a year to make sure she got to the required standard.
none of the teachers were going to do that. the headmaster over ruled them all by moving her forward with all the other students as an executive descision to avoid the teachers having to put in any official marking process.
though... once she got to high school 14-15 years old, things would be markedly different(i dont know where she went after middle school).
worth a completely different thread the ecconomics of social design & cultural norms
effectively what that data says about chile & mexico is that the unemployment rate among women is a national catastrophy keeping in mind 50% in the USA is pretty grim.
Quote:It’s obviously not necessary that both have careers,i dissagree, they cant be a power couple if only 1 of them has their foot to the floor.
holy crap !
Quote:Today about 48% of married couples in the US, for example, are dual income, compared with 25% in 1960.
50% unemployment rate ?!
thats scandalous ! (soo much for a capitalist democracy)
... moving on...
one thing i have noticed about these 'types' of people...
which seems to always be 'missed by many' when they talk about them...
which is quite odd because it seems to be quite important...
mostly, you have 2 super achievers who by chance & or unbelievably busy life style happen to have met each other.
while it may feel nice to bask in the glow of their awesomeness(if you think celebrity status is your thing, or money[mostly always involves money as super achievers tend to rise to the top])
these are the type of people, generally, that put around 3 times the work into the things they do.
Reminds me of The Rocks words "be the hardest working person in the room".
while being the hardest working person at that moment helps, it pays t keep in mind that they are also working twice as hard as the average person on the days you dont see them and while they are not in the room.
statistically the chances of 2 super achievers meeting & falling in love is fairly slim.
i guess this gives them a sense of fairytale status that many people like to fantasise about.
though the fairytale dream never involves the 70 hour weeks end to end for years that these type of people do.
Good statistics
Bad statistics
Random Chance
Low probability
High Probability
Meta-Data illusions ... ?
side note question.... Does Meta-Data make things seem more easy because you can see examples of it easily ?
is there any visualisation process ? possibly though those who are positively motivated by the opportunity to expereince positive encounters probably are going to seek out similar encounters.
the random chances that beat all the odds(keeping in mind these people have spent most of their lives beating the odds day in day by working 3 times as hard as the average person)...
[] Reminds me of a Girl from school. i did not know her as a friend, i was privy to the teachers confidante.
she had stamina and work ethic but failed to pick up the actual knowledge (probably a mix of allergys & visual/spacial cognitive plus a lack of alternate theory systems taught, possibly a mineral &/or vitamin deficiency etc).
All the teachers had a special off the books meeting about her because they did not know how to deal with marking her school reports.
none of them wanted to give her a bad mark, but she simply couold not pass the base 50% standard to hand the teachers the ability to simply move her forward.
1 teacher was effectively depressed by the situation for weeks.(real teachers really care)
all the national education rules said she had to be held back a year to make sure she got to the required standard.
none of the teachers were going to do that. the headmaster over ruled them all by moving her forward with all the other students as an executive descision to avoid the teachers having to put in any official marking process.
though... once she got to high school 14-15 years old, things would be markedly different(i dont know where she went after middle school).
worth a completely different thread the ecconomics of social design & cultural norms
Quote:In Denmark and Sweden, nearly 70% of couples with children are dual earners. In Chile, that figure is 40% and in Mexico, it’s 20%.
effectively what that data says about chile & mexico is that the unemployment rate among women is a national catastrophy keeping in mind 50% in the USA is pretty grim.