Eric Berger's hot-off-the-presses article in Ars Technica
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/08/it...stronauts/
"Following weeks of speculation, NASA finally made it official on Saturday: two astronauts who flew to the International Space Station on Boeing's Starliner spacecraft in June will not return home on that vehicle. Instead, the agency has asked SpaceX to use its Crew Dragon spacecraft to fly astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams back to Earth...
Saturday's announcement has big implications for Boeing... Ars will have additional coverage of Starliner's path forward later today...
Engineers from Boeing and NASA tested the performance of these thrusters at a facility in White Sands, New Mexico, in July. Initially, the engineers were excited to replicate the failures observed during Starliner's transit to the space station. (Replicating failures is a critical step to understanding the root cause of a hardware problem.)
However, what NASA found after taking apart the failed thrusters was concerning, said the chief of NASA's Commercial Crew Program, Steve Stich.
"I would say the White Sands testing did give us a surprise," Stich said Saturday. "It was this piece of Teflon that swells up and got in the flow path and causes the oxidizer to not go into the thruster the way it needs to. That's what caused the degradation of thrust. When we saw that, I think that's when things changed a bit for us."...
The result of this uncertainty is that NASA will now turn to the other commercial crew provider, SpaceX. This is not a pleasant outcome for Boeing which, a decade ago, looked askance at SpaceX as something akin to space cowboys. I have covered the space industry closely during the last 15 years, and during most of that time Boeing was perceived by much of the industry as the blueblood of spaceflight while SpaceX was the company that was going to kill astronauts due to its supposed recklessness..."
The now-iconic March 2004 Aviation Week cover from 20 years ago... that little rocket is SpaceX's original Falcon 1 rocket. Elon put half the money he got from selling his portion of Paypal into starting SpaceX. (The other half went into Tesla.) But despite that, they only had enough money to build four Falcon 1's... and the first three failed to reach orbit.
As to the question the magazine asks, I'd say the answer is an unequivocal 'Yes'. Privately held SpaceX's valuation is now estimated at ~$150 billion.
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/08/it...stronauts/
"Following weeks of speculation, NASA finally made it official on Saturday: two astronauts who flew to the International Space Station on Boeing's Starliner spacecraft in June will not return home on that vehicle. Instead, the agency has asked SpaceX to use its Crew Dragon spacecraft to fly astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams back to Earth...
Saturday's announcement has big implications for Boeing... Ars will have additional coverage of Starliner's path forward later today...
Engineers from Boeing and NASA tested the performance of these thrusters at a facility in White Sands, New Mexico, in July. Initially, the engineers were excited to replicate the failures observed during Starliner's transit to the space station. (Replicating failures is a critical step to understanding the root cause of a hardware problem.)
However, what NASA found after taking apart the failed thrusters was concerning, said the chief of NASA's Commercial Crew Program, Steve Stich.
"I would say the White Sands testing did give us a surprise," Stich said Saturday. "It was this piece of Teflon that swells up and got in the flow path and causes the oxidizer to not go into the thruster the way it needs to. That's what caused the degradation of thrust. When we saw that, I think that's when things changed a bit for us."...
The result of this uncertainty is that NASA will now turn to the other commercial crew provider, SpaceX. This is not a pleasant outcome for Boeing which, a decade ago, looked askance at SpaceX as something akin to space cowboys. I have covered the space industry closely during the last 15 years, and during most of that time Boeing was perceived by much of the industry as the blueblood of spaceflight while SpaceX was the company that was going to kill astronauts due to its supposed recklessness..."
The now-iconic March 2004 Aviation Week cover from 20 years ago... that little rocket is SpaceX's original Falcon 1 rocket. Elon put half the money he got from selling his portion of Paypal into starting SpaceX. (The other half went into Tesla.) But despite that, they only had enough money to build four Falcon 1's... and the first three failed to reach orbit.
As to the question the magazine asks, I'd say the answer is an unequivocal 'Yes'. Privately held SpaceX's valuation is now estimated at ~$150 billion.