Article  Alien life might not be something science can ever discover

#1
C C Offline
Could Earth be the only planet with intelligent life?
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/...gent-life/

KEY POINTS: We live in a vast observable Universe, with sextillions of stars and even larger numbers of planets, with more unobservable Universe and potentially even a multiverse beyond what we can see. While the ingredients for life and living planets are seemingly everywhere, however, we have yet to detect a single sign of life beyond Earth — even the simplest forms of life — on any world at all. Is it possible, or even likely, that despite all of the chances out there for intelligent life, planet Earth is home to the only instance of it in all of reality? Today, these are questions that no scientist can answer, but a great many scientists are working to uncover the evidence for, one way or another. Even if all we found was a world with microbial (or even simpler) life — which we fully expect should be the most common circumstance among all inhabited planets — we’d learn that Earth is not unique, and that life really is out there in the Universe... (MORE - details)


Alien life might not be something science can ever discover
https://aeon.co/essays/alien-life-might-...r-discover

EXCERPTS: ... ‘No single effect, experiment, or paper provides definitive evidence about its claims. Innovation identifies possibilities. Verification interrogates credibility. Progress depends on both.’ So opens the ‘Community Report from the Biosignatures Standards of Evidence Workshop’ (2022), quoting an earlier paper. The effects in question are not astrobiological: the quoted paper is from cancer research. But this is how all science works. Cumulatively, in small steps, on the shoulders of giants, and in fits and starts. It’s a process the public seldom sees. Nor does it match the story we’re usually told with its litany of heroes – Newton, Copernicus, Darwin, Einstein: men who saw beyond their era’s paradigm to glimpse a revolutionary new worldview, bringing it to humanity like Prometheus (but without the punitive price tag).

[...] A 2018 paper in the journal Astrobiology introduced a tool called ‘The Ladder of Life Detection’ that synthesises our understanding of life and our ways of detecting it into a framework for determining what combinations of evidence could be sufficient to ‘preclude any abiotic interpretation’; that is, to say not It is life but rather It couldn’t be anything else. The authors organised their criteria not by the potential to definitively prove life but ‘to convince a majority of the scientific community’. After all, life exists or it doesn’t – whether observed by humanity or not. What science changes is our collective knowledge. The threshold is consensus.

It seems like it should be simple. You have no trouble telling what’s alive from what’s not. A cat versus a rock, a tree versus water. You can recognise what might be called ‘technosignatures’ too, proof of intelligent life’s material manipulations: a car exhaust, a cell phone, a city grid. But astrobiologists say things like: ‘The detection of extraterrestrial life in our solar system and beyond will likely be neither instantaneous nor unambiguous.’ Or they write: ‘Evidence of life may be subtle or unfamiliar, and reveal itself only in stages, as one observing campaign informs the next.’ Aren’t they supposed to be smarter than us? They’re not exactly rocket scientists, but they’re in the department next door.

The problem is, you and I and the scientists are good at recognising Earth life. And big life, too. But scoop up a cup of seawater – or a slice of Antarctic ice – and it becomes much harder to determine what’s living. Even our intuition for habitable environments has been bested by microbial ingenuity, by extremophiles revealing the provinciality of our instincts. Then there’s viruses. Are they alive or not? You see how it gets tricky. Add to the mix trying to figure out all this from afar: with a remote-control robot on Mars, or a snapshot of a spectral reading of an exoplanet’s atmosphere, and you see that astrobiologists are trying to answer one of humanity’s biggest questions with something like a shadow show... (MORE - missing details)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article China is hunting for alien life. Here’s their plan if they make first contact C C 1 102 Jan 14, 2024 04:24 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Article Alien "life" more advanced than us would be artificial and bizarre in its motivations C C 1 135 Oct 28, 2023 05:51 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Article Scientists are hunting for alien objects in the ocean, & they've just found something C C 1 123 Jul 5, 2023 04:09 PM
Last Post: C C
  Missing stars: where did they go? + Five unproven claims that alien life exists C C 0 186 May 22, 2021 07:57 PM
Last Post: C C
  China's SETI program will find alien life first, says Chinese astronomer C C 0 141 Jan 27, 2021 10:17 PM
Last Post: C C
  Not Roswell: something crashed in Arizona desert this time C C 0 127 Nov 24, 2020 01:33 AM
Last Post: C C
  Why haven't we found alien life yet? Blame our closed minds C C 1 133 Nov 12, 2020 08:53 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Alien life is out there, but our theories are probably steering us away from it C C 1 309 Jan 3, 2020 07:12 PM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  2nd interstellar visitor not as odd as 1st + Galaxy might be full of micro-machines C C 1 379 Oct 16, 2019 09:50 PM
Last Post: Yazata
  Why the Dalai Lama says reincarnation might not be for him C C 3 1,799 Dec 24, 2014 09:00 PM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)