Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

In Defence of Knowledge or Doubting Radical Skepticism

#1
C C Offline
http://iainews.iai.tv/articles/in-defenc...e-auid-557

EXCERPT: Is knowledge overrated? Many philosophers think so. They have been convinced by the horrors of 20th century totalitarianism that the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake is not only dangerous but ruinous for humanity. This mistrust of knowledge – particularly scientific knowledge – now percolates throughout the humanities.

If there is anything resembling an unassailable doxa in the humanities, it is the following: absolute truth is a totalitarian ideal and the desire to know everything harbours a murderous impulse. We should give up our Platonic obsession with knowing the reality behind appearances and appreciate instead the multifaceted ambiguity of appearances, as well as the plurality of perspectives on the world. These have become familiar tenets of postmodern skepticism.

But skepticism is as old as philosophy and its resurgence in the second half of the 20th century needs to be put into historical perspective....
Reply
#2
Ostronomos Offline
(Sep 1, 2015 04:14 PM)C C Wrote: http://iainews.iai.tv/articles/in-defenc...e-auid-557

EXCERPT: Is knowledge overrated? Many philosophers think so. They have been convinced by the horrors of 20th century totalitarianism that the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake is not only dangerous but ruinous for humanity. This mistrust of knowledge – particularly scientific knowledge – now percolates throughout the humanities.

If there is anything resembling an unassailable doxa in the humanities, it is the following: absolute truth is a totalitarian ideal and the desire to know everything harbours a murderous impulse. We should give up our Platonic obsession with knowing the reality behind appearances and appreciate instead the multifaceted ambiguity of appearances, as well as the plurality of perspectives on the world. These have become familiar tenets of postmodern skepticism.

But skepticism is as old as philosophy and its resurgence in the second half of the 20th century needs to be put into historical perspective....

Depends on whether the knowledge can be made use of or not for benefitting one's life.

I sure hope these forums will blow up in popularity.
Reply
#3
Yazata Offline
(Sep 1, 2015 04:14 PM)C C Wrote: EXCERPT: Is knowledge overrated? Many philosophers think so. They have been convinced by the horrors of 20th century totalitarianism that the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake is not only dangerous but ruinous for humanity. This mistrust of knowledge – particularly scientific knowledge – now percolates throughout the humanities.

Especially in continental Europe. I think that's one of the biggest things distinguishing so-called 'continental' philosophy from Anglo-American (and Australian and Scandinavian) 'analytic' philosophy. It explains 'continental' philosophy's odd political assumptions and incessant (and often adolescent) strivings for 'liberation'.

To some extent, the whole history of Europe post-1945 (and most of its intellectual life) can be read as reactions to the two devastating world wars they themselves unleashed on the world in the first half of the 20th century. Certainly the European Union and many of its less functional peculiarities can be explained in that light.

Unfortunately, this kind of thinking has crossed the Atlantic and today dominates many humanities departments (especially literature for some reason), especially at the more elite and prestigious American and Canadian universities.

Quote:If there is anything resembling an unassailable doxa in the humanities, it is the following: absolute truth is a totalitarian ideal and the desire to know everything harbours a murderous impulse.

Right. We see it in the French particularly. Post-structuralism was all about that. We also see it in Heidegger's fulminations against 'instrumental reason'. Feminists wear it on their fashionable sleeves, with their 'standpoint epistemologies'.

Across the board, there's a hostility towards the ideal of disinterested objectivity.

'Disinterested' is out since intellectuals must always be politically committed to the left and to their defining race, class and gender identity (as long as it isn't white and male).

And objectivity is out since if there is any truth about the world that's true for all of us, that could justify those who know that truth exerting their will upon the always-alienated 'others'.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Is there a problem with skepticism? C C 7 215 Nov 1, 2023 11:22 AM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  Time for a robust defence of truth in science? (philosophy of science) C C 0 448 Mar 18, 2019 08:15 AM
Last Post: C C
  Connecting values to knowledge & action + On conscientiousness in animals C C 0 275 Jan 4, 2018 07:06 PM
Last Post: C C
  The tree of knowledge is not an apple or an oak but a banyan C C 0 258 Jul 3, 2017 03:42 AM
Last Post: C C
  World's Worst Philosopher Questions Knowledge Zinjanthropos 5 1,447 Feb 3, 2017 11:46 PM
Last Post: C C
  Does your knowledge about overpopulation and religion alienate you IRL elte 7 1,652 Sep 17, 2015 02:01 AM
Last Post: elte



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)