Michael Shermer documents the decline and fall of Scientific American

C C Offline

EXCERPTS (Jerry Coyne): I’ve written about a dozen posts calling out Scientific American for its fulminating wokeness (give me another word if you don’t like that one), in particular its use of op-eds to discuss and promote woke ideological views that have little or nothing to do with science.  A lot of readers here have canceled their subscriptions, but that hasn’t stopped Editor-in-Chief Laura Helmuth from subverting what was once the premier popular science magazine in America, turning it into a “progressive” political mouthpiece whose “real science” article get lamer and lamer.

Michael Shermer has personal experience of this, as he wrote over 200 columns for the magazine, eventually parting ways because the editors didn’t like the messages of some of his columns. He recounts this, and makes two other points, in his longish column at his new Substack site, “Skeptic“...

[...] It’s a tripartite column, making three points.

1.) The magazine has published a lot of woke and relatively nonscientific op-eds over the past few years...

[...] 2.) Despite the magazine’s claims, inequities in areas or professions are not prima facie evidence for bigotry, racism, or bias...

[...] 3.) Shermer was eventually booted from the magazine, ending his column, because he adduced facts and explanations that the woke editors didn’t like... (MORE - missing details)
- - - - - - 

RELATED: Scientific American again posting nonscientific political editorials

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Scientific American (and math) go full woke C C 2 69 Aug 31, 2021 04:19 AM
Last Post: Yazata
  Scientific American says 5G is dangerous, vegetables are junk food C C 0 180 Oct 23, 2019 03:03 PM
Last Post: C C
  Scientific American Says Vegetables Are Toxic, Sugary Snacks C C 0 135 Aug 21, 2019 06:41 PM
Last Post: C C

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)