Fermilab concedes to woke ignorance

#1
C C Offline
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opini...-ignorance

EXCERPT: . . . Last summer, Change–Now presented a 17-page list of demands to the Fermilab Directorate. It claimed that "anti-Black racism and other elements of white supremacy ... are embedded within structures at Fermilab." They envision a new Fermilab "that prioritizes humanity over productivity."

Herman White, a tenured black physicist who worked at Fermilab from 1971 to 2019, questions this perception: “If they’re saying African Americans aren’t welcome [at Fermilab], then I disagree. I grew up in the 1950s and 1960s in Tuskegee, Alabama, and people shot at our houses to stop us from integrating.” White’s account of his experience at Fermilab bears no resemblance to the white supremacist dystopia Change–Now describes.

Among their demands, they ask that black scientists be paid for voluntary social justice work. They want the activism of Fermilab employees to be funded by the government. They demand the absurd: "We call for hiring Black people into scientific and leadership positions in the laboratory to produce full representation (15%) within three years ... [but] they cannot all be cis-hetero Black men."

Fermilab employs 298 scientists. The most granular data says that 3.8% are either black or Latino, so probably around 1% are black. To attain a 15-fold increase, Fermilab would have to hire dozens of black scientists. Even if diversity was the sole goal in hiring, 15% representation within three years would be impossible: On average, black people receive only nine Ph.D.s in physics each year. The number of new noncis-hetero black male physicists doubtless averages fewer than one a year. Because black people earn 1% of physics Ph.D.s, the demographics of Fermilab scientists reflect the demographics of those qualified for the job.

Their ideology distorts reality to find racism everywhere. During the riots last summer, Fermilab urged its employees to "reject racism and lack of inclusion.' It also wrote that there is a "spectrum of views on these events represented at the lab, and all thoughtful and constructive views should be respected."

Predictably, Change–Now condemned the statement as "racist, insensitive, and harmful." It is racist, they write, to suggest that hiring black scientists would benefit the lab, as it contributes to the 'commodification of Blackness."

[...] Nigel Lockyer, director of Fermilab, took this personal insult in stride. He said he was "disappointed" in the response of Change–Now. Unfazed by the willful misrepresentation of his words and the incoherence of the response, Lockyer succumbed without a fight... (MORE - details)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article Will medical publishers fight Trump’s war on 'woke'? + Forensic metascience C C 0 996 Feb 23, 2025 08:12 PM
Last Post: C C
  Behavioral science needs to return to the basics (fixations with Woke ideology) C C 0 998 Sep 2, 2024 01:11 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article Science isn't "woke", but it is political C C 0 387 Oct 9, 2023 02:43 AM
Last Post: C C
  Another STEM field, particle physics, gets woke (not just a social sciences disease) C C 0 514 Sep 6, 2022 03:28 PM
Last Post: C C
  Annual evolution meeting raises some questions: More emphasis on Woke than science? C C 0 351 May 13, 2022 04:36 PM
Last Post: C C
  "Woke" school invasion runs into math obstacle from both parents & educators C C 0 398 Mar 30, 2022 05:19 PM
Last Post: C C
  'Woke' Scientific American goes anti-GMO + SciAm's hit job on E.O. Wilson C C 1 564 Jan 1, 2022 02:18 AM
Last Post: Syne
  MIT's para-religious romp in Woke creed + Why punish a scientist 4 defending science? C C 1 443 Dec 6, 2021 04:12 AM
Last Post: Zinjanthropos
  AMA jumps the Woke Shark, introduces Medspeak + Psychoactive meds convert to leftism? C C 0 348 Nov 2, 2021 05:38 PM
Last Post: C C
  Scientific American (and math) go full woke C C 2 544 Aug 31, 2021 04:19 AM
Last Post: Yazata



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)