Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Narcissism allows for less biased moral decisions + How people make so many choices

#1
C C Offline
Researchers uncover a surprising way that narcissism can allow for less biased moral decisions (psychological community)
https://www.psypost.org/2021/04/research...ions-60125

INTRO: Narcissism can promote less biased decision-making under some circumstances, according to new research published in the journal Self and Identity. The study provides new insights into how narcissistic personality traits are related to empathy, trust, and morality.

“The relationship between narcissism and empathy has been studied before, and many scholars consider ‘lack of empathy’ to be a core feature of narcissistic personalities,” said study author Pascal Burgmer, an assistant professor at the University of Kent. “We were interested in this topic because we anticipated that experiencing social trust (vs. distrust) might allow those with narcissistic personalities to feel more empathy than they otherwise would. In addition, sometimes experiencing empathy can make us biased in our treatment of others, and we might give people preferential treatment when we empathize with them.

“We thought that it would be fascinating to show that under these circumstances, narcissism will lead to less biased treatment of others, because narcissists primarily care about themselves, and their lack of empathy therefore does not motivate them to prefer any other person in particular. In that regard, they are more likely to treat other people similarly.”

Burgmer and his colleagues examined trait narcissism rather than clinical narcissistic personality disorder. Trait narcissism “is not binary, but a continuous” variable, he explained. “People score lower or higher on certain components of narcissism, and these can have positive or negative effects.”

In addition, the researchers were interested in two subtypes of trait narcissism: narcissistic admiration and narcissistic rivalry. Narcissistic admiration is characterized by grandiosity and charmingness, while narcissistic rivalry is characterized by aggressiveness and asserting supremacy. People high in narcissistic admiration tend to agree with statements such as “I deserve to be seen as a great personality,” while those high in narcissistic rivalry tend to agree with statements such as “I can barely stand it if another person is at the center of events.” (MORE)


How people decide when they have so many choices (psychological community)
https://news.osu.edu/how-people-decide-w...y-choices/

RELEASE: It’s one thing to decide among two or three snacks available at a friend’s house. But what do people do when they’re faced with a vending machine offering 36 different options? A new study using eye-tracking technology suggests that the amount of time people spend looking at individual items may actually help them decide. Findings showed that people tended to choose snacks they spent more time looking at, sometimes even over snacks that they rated more highly.

“We could do pretty well predicting what people would choose based just on their ratings of the snacks available to them. But we could do an even better job by accounting for how much they looked at each item,” said Ian Krajbich, co-author of the study and associate professor of psychology and economics at The Ohio State University.

But the amount of time people spend looking at individual items isn’t the whole story of how people decide when they have many alternatives, Krajbich said. “It’s a little more complicated than that,” he said.

Krajbich conducted the study with lead author Armin Thomas of Technische Universität Berlin and Felix Molter of Freie Universität Berlin. The research was published this week in the journal eLife. The study involved 49 people who said they were fans of snack foods and who agreed to fast for at least four hours before the study – to make sure the task was relevant to them.

On a computer screen, the participants were shown sets of 9, 16, 25 or 36 different snack foods and asked to choose which snack they would like to eat the most at the end of the experiment. They did this multiple times over the course of the experiment. An eye tracker recorded exactly where they looked while making these choices. After the experiments, participants rated how much they liked all 80 snacks that were part of the study.

The results showed that people didn’t look carefully at all the items before making a choice, or even just look at each item until they found one of their favorites. Instead, they looked around in a way that at first glance looked random, but depended on the physical location of the items as well as how much they were liked.

“There is this peripheral screening process where people learn to avoid even looking directly at the snacks they don’t really like,” Krajbich said. “This is not something that we see in studies where participants only have two alternatives. It only occurs when they have lots of options.”

One of the leading theories among researchers is that when people are presented with many choices, they scan until they find something that is “good enough” – in this case a snack they will enjoy, regardless of whether it is their favorite. But that’s not what happened, Krajbich said. If this “satisficing” model were true, people would quit looking as soon as they found a snack that was good enough. But results showed that participants chose the last snack they looked at only about 45% of the time.

Instead, what seemed to happen most often is that people would look through the items, often going back and forth between them, until one item stood out from the others – often the snack they looked at the most. “People made a choice when they concluded the best option was sufficiently better than the next-best option,” he said.

Where the snacks appeared in the display – left or right, top or bottom – didn’t play much of a role in people’s decision-making. Participants often started searching in the top left of the display and then looked left to right, top to bottom – but only to a limited extent. “Pretty quickly their attention gets drawn to their higher-value options. That influences their search process and their gaze starts to jump around less predictably,” he said.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why People Say So Many Stupid Things on Twitter C C 1 332 Sep 6, 2017 04:03 PM
Last Post: Magical Realist
  Group narcissism: The fury over retired NBA star Ray Allen's trip to Auschwitz C C 2 362 Aug 7, 2017 02:50 AM
Last Post: RainbowUnicorn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)