<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum - Site Feedback]]></title>
		<link>https://www.scivillage.com/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum - https://www.scivillage.com]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 11:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New subforum proposal..]]></title>
			<link>https://www.scivillage.com/thread-20281.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 18:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=9">Magical Realist</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-20281.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I am fascinated with words and with language overall. I propose the addition of a new sub forum that covers language and words and communication and even the media. None of the present subfora really address this important facet of human life.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I am fascinated with words and with language overall. I propose the addition of a new sub forum that covers language and words and communication and even the media. None of the present subfora really address this important facet of human life.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[False ban?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.scivillage.com/thread-19627.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 23:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=9">Magical Realist</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-19627.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I keep getting the "you have been banned" page here. Then it sporadically comes back ok. What's the issue? I sense I'm being targeted by a past banned member.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I keep getting the "you have been banned" page here. Then it sporadically comes back ok. What's the issue? I sense I'm being targeted by a past banned member.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Site changes 2026]]></title>
			<link>https://www.scivillage.com/thread-19582.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 21:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">stryder</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-19582.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Note much to add just yet however:<br />
<ul class="mycode_list"><li>Removed/Disaabled Archive lite.  It didn't do too much other than allow bots to have a ton of other links to follow which meant more workload.<br />
</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Note much to add just yet however:<br />
<ul class="mycode_list"><li>Removed/Disaabled Archive lite.  It didn't do too much other than allow bots to have a ton of other links to follow which meant more workload.<br />
</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Forum slow?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.scivillage.com/thread-19427.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2025 21:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=74">Syne</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-19427.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Is it just me, or is the forum intermittently slow?<br />
<br />
I've clear site data from my browser, but that didn't help.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is it just me, or is the forum intermittently slow?<br />
<br />
I've clear site data from my browser, but that didn't help.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Arms wide]]></title>
			<link>https://www.scivillage.com/thread-17849.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 02:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=101">confused2</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-17849.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Contemplating a post I thought "This is going to take some time to prepare". CC and Yazata at Scivillage. Arms wide. Thanks guys.<br />
For anyone too young to remember the Stanley Matthews  combover search "Temba his arms wide"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Contemplating a post I thought "This is going to take some time to prepare". CC and Yazata at Scivillage. Arms wide. Thanks guys.<br />
For anyone too young to remember the Stanley Matthews  combover search "Temba his arms wide"]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Guest count and users browsing?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.scivillage.com/thread-16506.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 01:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=41">Secular Sanity</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-16506.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Is the guest count and users browsing fake?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is the guest count and users browsing fake?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Atmospheric CO2 csv  DATA ONLY]]></title>
			<link>https://www.scivillage.com/thread-16251.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2024 18:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=101">confused2</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-16251.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[year,mean ppm<br />
1800,0<br />
1800, 282<br />
1900,295<br />
1959,315.98<br />
1960,316.91<br />
1961,317.64<br />
1962,318.45<br />
1963,318.99<br />
1964,319.62<br />
1965,320.04<br />
1966,321.37<br />
1967,322.18<br />
1968,323.05<br />
1969,324.62<br />
1970,325.68<br />
1971,326.32<br />
1972,327.46<br />
1973,329.68<br />
1974,330.19<br />
1975,331.13<br />
1976,332.03<br />
1977,333.84<br />
1978,335.41<br />
1979,336.84<br />
1980,338.76<br />
1981,340.12<br />
1982,341.48<br />
1983,343.15<br />
1984,344.87<br />
1985,346.35<br />
1986,347.61<br />
1987,349.31<br />
1988,351.69<br />
1989,353.2<br />
1990,354.45<br />
1991,355.7<br />
1992,356.54<br />
1993,357.21<br />
1994,358.96<br />
1995,360.97<br />
1996,362.74<br />
1997,363.88<br />
1998,366.84<br />
1999,368.54<br />
2000,369.71<br />
2001,371.32<br />
2002,373.45<br />
2003,375.98<br />
2004,377.7<br />
2005,379.98<br />
2006,382.09<br />
2007,384.02<br />
2008,385.83<br />
2009,387.64<br />
2010,390.1<br />
2011,391.85<br />
2012,394.06<br />
2013,396.74<br />
2014,398.81<br />
2015,401.01<br />
2016,404.41<br />
2017,406.76<br />
2018,408.72<br />
2019,411.65<br />
2020,414.21<br />
2021,416.41<br />
2022,418.53<br />
2023,421.08]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[year,mean ppm<br />
1800,0<br />
1800, 282<br />
1900,295<br />
1959,315.98<br />
1960,316.91<br />
1961,317.64<br />
1962,318.45<br />
1963,318.99<br />
1964,319.62<br />
1965,320.04<br />
1966,321.37<br />
1967,322.18<br />
1968,323.05<br />
1969,324.62<br />
1970,325.68<br />
1971,326.32<br />
1972,327.46<br />
1973,329.68<br />
1974,330.19<br />
1975,331.13<br />
1976,332.03<br />
1977,333.84<br />
1978,335.41<br />
1979,336.84<br />
1980,338.76<br />
1981,340.12<br />
1982,341.48<br />
1983,343.15<br />
1984,344.87<br />
1985,346.35<br />
1986,347.61<br />
1987,349.31<br />
1988,351.69<br />
1989,353.2<br />
1990,354.45<br />
1991,355.7<br />
1992,356.54<br />
1993,357.21<br />
1994,358.96<br />
1995,360.97<br />
1996,362.74<br />
1997,363.88<br />
1998,366.84<br />
1999,368.54<br />
2000,369.71<br />
2001,371.32<br />
2002,373.45<br />
2003,375.98<br />
2004,377.7<br />
2005,379.98<br />
2006,382.09<br />
2007,384.02<br />
2008,385.83<br />
2009,387.64<br />
2010,390.1<br />
2011,391.85<br />
2012,394.06<br />
2013,396.74<br />
2014,398.81<br />
2015,401.01<br />
2016,404.41<br />
2017,406.76<br />
2018,408.72<br />
2019,411.65<br />
2020,414.21<br />
2021,416.41<br />
2022,418.53<br />
2023,421.08]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The "real" purpose of the Alternative Theories sub-forum?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.scivillage.com/thread-16065.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 19:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=6">C C</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-16065.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I believe AT (alternative theories) was originally introduced to accommodate Ostro's fixation with <a href="https://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Cognitive-Theoretic_Model_of_the_Universe" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow external ugc" class="mycode_url">CTMU</a>. Or, to generalize, any kind of constant low-level spamming, proselytizing or promotion of fringe proposals. The failed outcome, of course, being that AT is more or less the very last place where Ostro posts his passion. <br />
<br />
In contrast, Tony Lang is operating in the correct lane. Essentially "blogging" about the idea from his book in the appropriate sub-forum. He doesn't post links to it, thereby avoiding classification as direct spam. ("<span style="color: #660000;" class="mycode_color">What is a living individual and is it naturally universally mobile?</span>")<br />
<br />
So the omen here, ironically, does not revolve so much around Tony Lang (who, again, is utilizing AT as arguably intended). But with respect to our being vigilant about growing public perception that Scivillage might be a choice place to set up shop at for anybody with a manuscript or offbeat concept or conspiracy to hawk. And those being newcomers who <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">do not</span> operate in the correct sub-forum.  <br />
<br />
These would especially be people (or bots) who don't participate or contribute to the overall message board in any other way. Possessing the characteristic of overwhelmingly advertising a particular product or narrow product range. <br />
<br />
IOW, don't mistake updates in Astronaut topics for such or even the conspiracies of ___ skeptics, wherein applicable posters are noted for submitting a wide spectrum of heterogeneous material and replies across multiple subject areas. <br />
<br />
The only time I would even use the "Wrong forum" option in the menu of the REPORT button is in situations where the individual is doing things like the above (i.e., single-mindedly blogging about what they are either marketing or shilling for, and contributing nothing else to the overall message board). <br />
<br />
And the concern in that context is that such items should be moved exclusively to "Alternative theories". Even if what is being monotonously promoted is a personal food recipe for asparagus that has nothing to do with crank science theories. By that, I mean that Alternative Theories should be the exclusive relocation ground for "promotional blogging" threads and topics, so that any future epidemic of such does not clog-up the rest of the message board. <br />
<br />
But the problem with the "Wrong forum" option in REPORT, is that there is no space to clarify the "why" and the proposed specific sub-forum such instances be moved to. Obviously the remedy is to instead use the "Other" option which does provide an information space. <br />
<br />
So a suggestion for this might be: Select "Other" and write "<span style="color: #660000;" class="mycode_color">Wrong forum, Move to Alt Theories due to promotional blogging.</span>" Or if there's not enough room, drop the "Wrong forum" intro. Not that it wouldn't be great to have enough space to add filler like "<span style="color: #660000;" class="mycode_color">fervently preoccupied with this</span>" and "<span style="color: #660000;" class="mycode_color">the member does nothing else on the board but this</span>".]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I believe AT (alternative theories) was originally introduced to accommodate Ostro's fixation with <a href="https://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Cognitive-Theoretic_Model_of_the_Universe" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow external ugc" class="mycode_url">CTMU</a>. Or, to generalize, any kind of constant low-level spamming, proselytizing or promotion of fringe proposals. The failed outcome, of course, being that AT is more or less the very last place where Ostro posts his passion. <br />
<br />
In contrast, Tony Lang is operating in the correct lane. Essentially "blogging" about the idea from his book in the appropriate sub-forum. He doesn't post links to it, thereby avoiding classification as direct spam. ("<span style="color: #660000;" class="mycode_color">What is a living individual and is it naturally universally mobile?</span>")<br />
<br />
So the omen here, ironically, does not revolve so much around Tony Lang (who, again, is utilizing AT as arguably intended). But with respect to our being vigilant about growing public perception that Scivillage might be a choice place to set up shop at for anybody with a manuscript or offbeat concept or conspiracy to hawk. And those being newcomers who <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">do not</span> operate in the correct sub-forum.  <br />
<br />
These would especially be people (or bots) who don't participate or contribute to the overall message board in any other way. Possessing the characteristic of overwhelmingly advertising a particular product or narrow product range. <br />
<br />
IOW, don't mistake updates in Astronaut topics for such or even the conspiracies of ___ skeptics, wherein applicable posters are noted for submitting a wide spectrum of heterogeneous material and replies across multiple subject areas. <br />
<br />
The only time I would even use the "Wrong forum" option in the menu of the REPORT button is in situations where the individual is doing things like the above (i.e., single-mindedly blogging about what they are either marketing or shilling for, and contributing nothing else to the overall message board). <br />
<br />
And the concern in that context is that such items should be moved exclusively to "Alternative theories". Even if what is being monotonously promoted is a personal food recipe for asparagus that has nothing to do with crank science theories. By that, I mean that Alternative Theories should be the exclusive relocation ground for "promotional blogging" threads and topics, so that any future epidemic of such does not clog-up the rest of the message board. <br />
<br />
But the problem with the "Wrong forum" option in REPORT, is that there is no space to clarify the "why" and the proposed specific sub-forum such instances be moved to. Obviously the remedy is to instead use the "Other" option which does provide an information space. <br />
<br />
So a suggestion for this might be: Select "Other" and write "<span style="color: #660000;" class="mycode_color">Wrong forum, Move to Alt Theories due to promotional blogging.</span>" Or if there's not enough room, drop the "Wrong forum" intro. Not that it wouldn't be great to have enough space to add filler like "<span style="color: #660000;" class="mycode_color">fervently preoccupied with this</span>" and "<span style="color: #660000;" class="mycode_color">the member does nothing else on the board but this</span>".]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Glitch alert: Invalid warning being attached to threads]]></title>
			<link>https://www.scivillage.com/thread-15484.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 23:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=6">C C</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-15484.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[There's a spurious "Caution: Old Thread" warning that is being attached to new topics. It requires multiple edits of playing around with the Prefix labels to finally get rid of it. <br />
<br />
EDIT: Hah! I see this very thread is currently sporting it, so the problem is self-evident. I'm leaving it as evidence. <br />
<br />
2nd EDIT: Apparently it's only temporary. Returning to the posts later, the advisory disappears.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[There's a spurious "Caution: Old Thread" warning that is being attached to new topics. It requires multiple edits of playing around with the Prefix labels to finally get rid of it. <br />
<br />
EDIT: Hah! I see this very thread is currently sporting it, so the problem is self-evident. I'm leaving it as evidence. <br />
<br />
2nd EDIT: Apparently it's only temporary. Returning to the posts later, the advisory disappears.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Trivial glitch]]></title>
			<link>https://www.scivillage.com/thread-14540.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=6">C C</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-14540.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[After logging out, the site no longer shows logged out unless the page is reloaded or refreshed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[After logging out, the site no longer shows logged out unless the page is reloaded or refreshed.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is it time for the "Like" feature to return? Vote?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.scivillage.com/thread-14523.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 01:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=6">C C</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-14523.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[A member pointed out elsewhere that lack of it might be detracting from SV's popularity. Perhaps similar to a woodland cabin without running water. I can't even recall the reason why we voted to get rid of it _X_ years ago. Or what the original system was (maybe it was more complicated than a simple "Like" option).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A member pointed out elsewhere that lack of it might be detracting from SV's popularity. Perhaps similar to a woodland cabin without running water. I can't even recall the reason why we voted to get rid of it _X_ years ago. Or what the original system was (maybe it was more complicated than a simple "Like" option).]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What happened to the "casual discussion" label Scivillage once had?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.scivillage.com/thread-14518.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 17:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=6">C C</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-14518.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Or is it actually still around, and I've become cognitively blind to what's right in front of me? Or is it just my imagination that there was ever anything like that to begin with? It doesn't feel like the latter could be the case, because I recollect Zin saying years ago that he'd never encountered a science forum describing itself like that before.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Or is it actually still around, and I've become cognitively blind to what's right in front of me? Or is it just my imagination that there was ever anything like that to begin with? It doesn't feel like the latter could be the case, because I recollect Zin saying years ago that he'd never encountered a science forum describing itself like that before.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Images not showing (socialtracking blockers)]]></title>
			<link>https://www.scivillage.com/thread-14440.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 04:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=74">Syne</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-14440.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite><span> (Jul 25, 2023 02:49 AM)</span>Yazata Wrote:  <a href="https://www.scivillage.com/post-58967.html#pid58967" class="quick_jump"></a></cite>Everyone (all the democrats at least) predicted that Twitter was going to collapse and disappear under Elon's control.<br />
<br />
Well, in a way it was true. Twitter really is going away! It's being rebranded as  X.com<br />
<br />
<figure><br />
 <img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1683352940466061313/ROqzFNVh_bigger.jpg" alt="[Image: ROqzFNVh_bigger.jpg]"  class="mycode_img" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"/><br />
 	 <figcaption><a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1683352940466061313/ROqzFNVh_bigger.jpg" title="[Image: ROqzFNVh_bigger.jpg]" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow external ugc">[Image: ROqzFNVh_bigger.jpg]</a></figcaption><br />
</figure><br />
<br />
Everyone is trying to figure out if Tweets are now  X's and if Tweeting is now  X'ing.<br />
<br />
Here's X headquarters in San Francisco last night<br />
<br />
<figure><br />
 <img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F11B1uVWIAA2XGo?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900" alt="[Image: F11B1uVWIAA2XGo?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900]"  class="mycode_img" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"/><br />
 	 <figcaption><a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F11B1uVWIAA2XGo?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900" title="[Image: F11B1uVWIAA2XGo?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900]" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow external ugc">[Image: F11B1uVWIAA2XGo?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900]</a></figcaption><br />
</figure></blockquote><br />
Are the images showing up for others?<br />
All I'm seeing is:<br />
[Image: ROqzFNVh_bigger.jpg]<br />
And:<br />
[Image: F11B1uVWIAA2XGo?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite><span> (Jul 25, 2023 02:49 AM)</span>Yazata Wrote:  <a href="https://www.scivillage.com/post-58967.html#pid58967" class="quick_jump"></a></cite>Everyone (all the democrats at least) predicted that Twitter was going to collapse and disappear under Elon's control.<br />
<br />
Well, in a way it was true. Twitter really is going away! It's being rebranded as  X.com<br />
<br />
<figure><br />
 <img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1683352940466061313/ROqzFNVh_bigger.jpg" alt="[Image: ROqzFNVh_bigger.jpg]"  class="mycode_img" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"/><br />
 	 <figcaption><a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1683352940466061313/ROqzFNVh_bigger.jpg" title="[Image: ROqzFNVh_bigger.jpg]" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow external ugc">[Image: ROqzFNVh_bigger.jpg]</a></figcaption><br />
</figure><br />
<br />
Everyone is trying to figure out if Tweets are now  X's and if Tweeting is now  X'ing.<br />
<br />
Here's X headquarters in San Francisco last night<br />
<br />
<figure><br />
 <img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F11B1uVWIAA2XGo?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900" alt="[Image: F11B1uVWIAA2XGo?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900]"  class="mycode_img" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"/><br />
 	 <figcaption><a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F11B1uVWIAA2XGo?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900" title="[Image: F11B1uVWIAA2XGo?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900]" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow external ugc">[Image: F11B1uVWIAA2XGo?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900]</a></figcaption><br />
</figure></blockquote><br />
Are the images showing up for others?<br />
All I'm seeing is:<br />
[Image: ROqzFNVh_bigger.jpg]<br />
And:<br />
[Image: F11B1uVWIAA2XGo?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900]]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Watchtower alerts]]></title>
			<link>https://www.scivillage.com/thread-14382.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2023 19:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=6">C C</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-14382.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Look out for potential spam being posted under old (and new) threads somewhere down the road. Briefly noticed a "new member" with a lot of numbers at the end of the name. And location as Russia. <br />
<br />
Might be legit, but doesn't seem likely with that combination. Time will tell. <br />
<br />
EDIT: <span style="color: #660000;" class="mycode_color">Another one added: "------petrov1435". All but clinches the spambots building up... </span><br />
<br />
(Yeah, I'm just using this as an excuse to start to a thread titled "Watchtower alerts". Might be useful for something in the future.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Look out for potential spam being posted under old (and new) threads somewhere down the road. Briefly noticed a "new member" with a lot of numbers at the end of the name. And location as Russia. <br />
<br />
Might be legit, but doesn't seem likely with that combination. Time will tell. <br />
<br />
EDIT: <span style="color: #660000;" class="mycode_color">Another one added: "------petrov1435". All but clinches the spambots building up... </span><br />
<br />
(Yeah, I'm just using this as an excuse to start to a thread titled "Watchtower alerts". Might be useful for something in the future.)]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Accoustic guitarist thread..]]></title>
			<link>https://www.scivillage.com/thread-13918.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 22:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=101">confused2</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-13918.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm not sure what (if any) superlatives I have left for these threads (successor to one man band thread). I'll go with 'blissed out' - this will never be played better no matter how long humanity lasts .. possibly differently but never better.<br />
<br />
<br />
Gabriella Quevedo: "Everybody Wants To Rule The World" (Tears For Fears)<br />
<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/thread-13881-post-57301.html#pid57301" target="_blank" rel="noopener " class="mycode_url">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-13881-...l#pid57301</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm not sure what (if any) superlatives I have left for these threads (successor to one man band thread). I'll go with 'blissed out' - this will never be played better no matter how long humanity lasts .. possibly differently but never better.<br />
<br />
<br />
Gabriella Quevedo: "Everybody Wants To Rule The World" (Tears For Fears)<br />
<a href="https://www.scivillage.com/thread-13881-post-57301.html#pid57301" target="_blank" rel="noopener " class="mycode_url">https://www.scivillage.com/thread-13881-...l#pid57301</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>