Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum
Science denial not limited to political right - Printable Version

+- Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum (https://www.scivillage.com)
+-- Forum: Science (https://www.scivillage.com/forum-61.html)
+--- Forum: Junk Science (https://www.scivillage.com/forum-88.html)
+--- Thread: Science denial not limited to political right (/thread-4230.html)



Science denial not limited to political right - C C - Sep 21, 2017

http://today.uic.edu/science-denial-not-limited-to-political-right

EXCERPT: [...] Once they were informed of the correct interpretations of the data, participants were then asked to rate how much they agreed with, found knowledgeable, and trusted the researchers’ correct interpretation.

“Not only were both sides equally likely to seek out attitude confirming scientific conclusions, both were also willing to work harder and longer when doing so got them to a conclusion that fit with their existing attitudes,” says Washburn, the lead author of the study. “And when the correct interpretation of the results did not confirm participants’ attitudes, they were more likely to view the researchers involved with the study as less trustworthy, less knowledgeable, and disagreed with their conclusions more.”

These effects were constant no matter what issue was under consideration, which included six social issues — immigration, gun control, climate change, health care reform, nuclear power and same sex marriage — and one control issue — skin rash treatment.

Rather than strictly a conservative phenomenon, science denial may be a result of a more basic desire of people wanting to see the world in ways that fit with their personal preferences, political or otherwise, according to the researchers....

- - -


RE: Science denial not limited to political right - RainbowUnicorn - Sep 21, 2017

(Sep 21, 2017 03:18 AM)C C Wrote: http://today.uic.edu/science-denial-not-limited-to-political-right

EXCERPT: [...] Once they were informed of the correct interpretations of the data, participants were then asked to rate how much they agreed with, found knowledgeable, and trusted the researchers’ correct interpretation.

“Not only were both sides equally likely to seek out attitude confirming scientific conclusions, both were also willing to work harder and longer when doing so got them to a conclusion that fit with their existing attitudes,” says Washburn, the lead author of the study. “And when the correct interpretation of the results did not confirm participants’ attitudes, they were more likely to view the researchers involved with the study as less trustworthy, less knowledgeable, and disagreed with their conclusions more.”

These effects were constant no matter what issue was under consideration, which included six social issues — immigration, gun control, climate change, health care reform, nuclear power and same sex marriage — and one control issue — skin rash treatment.

Rather than strictly a conservative phenomenon, science denial may be a result of a more basic desire of people wanting to see the world in ways that fit with their personal preferences, political or otherwise, according to the researchers....

- - -

were this not true as a traite of the species, religion would not be such a popular life style choice.


and... considering the millions of cult members whom follow TV evangelists... sedentry intellectual cowardice is the projected cultural norm.

added, you cant compare public opinion of science in the USA to other countrys.
it is purely a profit based process.
Modern society is governed by a profit motive for scientific discovery based on a sales process to deliver the same result to different perceptual wants.
Consumerism driven scientific reality.

it would be much more accurate to look at surveys done back around when NASA was the primary scientific institution in the publics perception.
the results would probably be vastly different.