![]() |
|
Correlation isn't Causation - Printable Version +- Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum (https://www.scivillage.com) +-- Forum: Science (https://www.scivillage.com/forum-61.html) +--- Forum: Junk Science (https://www.scivillage.com/forum-88.html) +--- Thread: Correlation isn't Causation (/thread-3152.html) |
Correlation isn't Causation - Yazata - Dec 24, 2016 Correlation isn't Causation... or maybe it is. US spending on science, space and technology has a 99.79% correlation with suicides by hanging, strangulation and suffocation. The number of drownings by falls into swimming pools has a 66.6% correlation with the number of films that Nicholas Cage appears in annually. Worldwide consumption of mozzarella cheese has a 95.86% correlation to the number of civil engineering degrees awarded. The age of Miss America has an 87% correlation with murders by steam, hot vapors and hot objects. The annual divorce rate in Maine has a 99.26% correlation with per-capita consumption of margarine. Tyler Vigen, a former military intelligence analyst turned Harvard law student, has a computer algorithm that detects correlations in fluctuations in numerical time-series data. So just shovel in the data and watch to see what weird correlations the computer finds. http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations It really makes me wonder about the credibility of so-called "social sciences" where statistical correlations between A and B are often the best evidence that they can produce. Number of math doctorates awarded has a 95.23% correlation to amount of uranium stored at nuclear power plants! (Who knew?) RE: Correlation isn't Causation - Syne - Dec 24, 2016 (Dec 24, 2016 08:15 PM)Yazata Wrote: It really makes me wonder about the credibility of so-called "social sciences" where statistical correlations between A and B are often the best evidence that they can produce. While spurious correlation cannot be causative, except in predictions about election outcomes, they are fun. There's a very good reason the social sciences are considered "soft science". But maybe the upside is that Trump's latest talk about nuclear weapons will give mathematics degrees a shot in the arm. |