![]() |
|
Should we trust predictive policing? + Why so few women mathematicians? - Printable Version +- Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum (https://www.scivillage.com) +-- Forum: Science (https://www.scivillage.com/forum-61.html) +--- Forum: Ergonomics, Statistics & Logistics (https://www.scivillage.com/forum-78.html) +--- Thread: Should we trust predictive policing? + Why so few women mathematicians? (/thread-3004.html) |
Should we trust predictive policing? + Why so few women mathematicians? - C C - Nov 5, 2016 Should we trust predictive policing software to cut crime? https://aeon.co/essays/should-we-trust-predictive-policing-software-to-cut-crime EXCERPT: [...] It is no surprise, then, that versions of predictive policing have been adopted (or soon will be) in Atlanta, New York, Philadelphia, Seattle and dozens of other US cities. These programs are finally putting the enticing promises to a real-world test. Based on statistical analysis of crime data and mathematical modelling of criminal activity, predictive policing is intended to forecast where and when crimes will happen. The seemingly unassailable goal is to use resources to fight crime and serve communities most effectively. Police departments and city administrations have welcomed this approach, believing it can substantially cut crime. William Bratton, who in September stepped down as commissioner of New York City’s police department – the nation’s biggest – calls it the future of policing. But even if predictive policing cuts crime as claimed, which is open to question, it raises grave concerns about its impact on civil rights and minorities... Why Are There So Few Women Mathematicians? http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/math-women/506417/ EXCERPT: [...] “At some point I thought, I need to be doing something active to contribute to addressing this problem.” So Topaz and the Macalester statistician Shilad Sen set to work by looking at a new metric of academic success: the editorial boards of academic journals. Who’s on an editorial board may seem like an esoteric statistic, but Topaz and Sen argue that it’s a proxy for women’s leadership in a field. Think of the editors as the gatekeepers of science: They direct journals’ peer-review process, the backbone of modern science. Editors call the shots on which papers get published in their journals—and this affects the ultimate direction of a field.... RE: Should we trust predictive policing? + Why so few women mathematicians? - stryder - Nov 11, 2016 RE: Women in Mathematics While I don't currently feed enough output to Twitter, I have got it set-up to follow a number of scientific related groups and people, one such group on there is actually Women in Mathematics. I just thought I would mention it encase anyone interested to know about women in the Field of Mathematics. |