![]() |
|
Article Trial lawyers are pissed about self-driving cars diminishing profits - Printable Version +- Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum (https://www.scivillage.com) +-- Forum: Culture (https://www.scivillage.com/forum-49.html) +--- Forum: Vehicles & Travel (https://www.scivillage.com/forum-84.html) +--- Thread: Article Trial lawyers are pissed about self-driving cars diminishing profits (/thread-21614.html) |
Trial lawyers are pissed about self-driving cars diminishing profits - C C - Oct 19, 2026 Why are trial lawyers afraid of self-driving cars? https://www.acsh.org/news/2026/10/16/why-are-trial-lawyers-afraid-self-driving-cars-50394 EXCERPTS: Self-driving cars promise fewer accidents, fewer injuries, and potentially thousands of lives saved. That sounds like good news for everyone—except perhaps the personal-injury lawyers whose livelihoods depend on crashes and harm. A proposed federal law governing autonomous vehicles raises an uncomfortable question: When technological progress promises safer travel for pedestrians and drivers but threatens an established business, whose interests come first? [...] The good news, or maybe not, depending on one’s perspective, is that autonomous vehicles seem to be a godsend in terms of promoting safety and avoiding accidents. [...] The official policy statement of the American Association of Justice (AAJ), which represents the plaintiffs’ bar, advances arguments that mirror its position in Monsanto v. Durnell, in which the Supreme Court ruled that federal pesticide-labeling law preempts state failure-to-warn lawsuits when EPA regulations are complied with. Without basis and, in some cases, outright falsely, the AAJ also claims the proposed law:
|