+- Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum (https://www.scivillage.com)
+-- Forum: Culture (https://www.scivillage.com/forum-49.html)
+--- Forum: Do-It-Yourself (https://www.scivillage.com/forum-131.html)
+--- Thread: Radicals welcomed into UK, but Starmer just banned "polite" Dutch woman? (DIY cancel) (/thread-19613.html)
Radicals welcomed into UK, but Starmer just banned "polite" Dutch woman? (DIY cancel) - C C - Jan 16, 2026
An irony here is that a Middle Eastern country like the UAE has cut funds for citizens keen to study in the UK, due to its view that the British state is lax in allowing Muslim Brotherhood to indoctrinate and recruit on UK campuses (excerpt): "The exclusion of British universities is linked to anxiety in the UAE over what it sees as the risk of Islamist radicalisation on UK campuses, according to three people familiar with the matter."
- - - - - - - - - - - -
LEO KEARSE
https://youtu.be/BtvvXX7slCs
VIDEO INTRO: The Labour Party has finally barred someone from coming to the UK. It's finally happened. It's not an Islamist militant or a hate preacher or a Janjua warrior. Those are still beckoned on in.
The latter are still chaperoned to their hotels, and they're even allowed to preach about how to stone women to death at government-funded mosques, and they're protected. They're given council flats, and as we just saw in that last clip, they can form grooming gangs or whatever.
No, the person who Labour considers a threat to public safety and not conducive to the public good, is a polite, civilized blonde woman from the Netherlands: Eva Vlaardingerbroek.
I've got no idea if I am pronouncing that right. Is it like an Irish name? I don't know. Maybe it was easier to ban her than try and spell her name on the visa form.
Here's Eva herself talking about why she's been banned:
So, I just got an email I didn't expect. I have officially been banned from traveling to the United Kingdom. I am not allowed to enter the country because the UK government under Keir Starmer deems my presence in the UK, and I quote: "Not conducive to the public good."
I don't know what that means, since when is being conducive to the public good a requirement to enter a country? I mean, especially in the United Kingdom -- where, if I'm not mistaken, thousands of illegal immigrants enter through the channel every day. Every day, nobody's asking them to be conducive to the public good.
But I cannot come. [...] Now, I went back in September to join the Tommy Robinson rally where I spoke, and I was planning Ido that again in May. Guess not.
And now the timing is quite suspicious, isn't it? Because 3 days ago, I posted this about Keir, calling out his hypocrisy that he wants to ban X because of women's safety, whilst at the same time he's the one who's allowing these migrant gang rapes to happen.
Obviously, he's just doing that because he wants to ban free speech, and that is also the reason why I am now not allowed anymore to go to the UK. But it's pretty dystopian. And as it says in the email, I cannot appeal. I'm not convicted of any crime. I'm not under suspicion of any crime. Keir Starmer just decided that someone like me is not welcome in the UK...
RELATED (scivillage): Online Safety Act allows Ofcom to monitor smartphone messages for speech violations?