+- Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum (https://www.scivillage.com)
+-- Forum: Science (https://www.scivillage.com/forum-61.html)
+--- Forum: Alternative Theories (https://www.scivillage.com/forum-130.html)
+--- Thread: CTMU glossary (sort of) (/thread-1408.html)
CTMU glossary (sort of) - C C - Oct 9, 2015
Well, after all, CTMU is what triggered the creation of "Alternative Theories" here.
And accordingly the subforum should probably be territorially marked with it from time to time, though not necessarily in the canine fashion. CTMU's obscure nomenclature is unremarkably dismissed as meaningless babble at SciForums. Needless to point-out, even the "in-house" terminology of many established disciplines (including physics, biology, etc) could also evoke similar responses from outsiders. Yet the esoteric appearance of those mainstream practices is excused by the majority of us prim and proletariat barbarians. Due to their words / symbols / descriptions seeming to mobilize or summon "heap big magic" in the form of cures and technological and engineering results.
CTMU might be internally consistent enough to warrant acceptance as yet another systematic metaphysical conception (of double-aspect monism). But therein lies the rub: It appears to be a philosophical scheme --> science wannabe. Some of the 18th-century spins on Plato's sensible / supersensible genre set themselves up as a prior in rank hierarchical level that simply assimilated nature and its methodological investigation, thereby avoiding doing damage to the scientific process or interfering with it. But the reverse is usually not possible (of a speculative philosophical offering literally achieving scientific status, rather than just subsume the object of the latter's study as a hyponym). The regulatory preconceptions which science operates under more or less lack tolerance for such applicants.
"Don't LOOK at anything in a physics lab, Don't TASTE anything in a chemistry lab, Don't SMELL anything in a biology lab, Don't TOUCH anything in a medical lab, and, most importantly, Don't LISTEN to anything in a philosophy department!" --Timothy Vaughn
Links to the definitions (note that even familiar terms might have eccentric usages or deviations in the context of CTMU):
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Absolute_truth
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Causality
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Closed_descriptive_manifold
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Conspansion
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Conspansive_duality
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Constructive-filtrative_duality
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Distributed_solipsism
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Distributed_syntax
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Duality_principles
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Extended_Superposition_Principle
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Generalized_cognition
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Generalized_utility
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/God
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Hology
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Holotheism
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Human_Cognitive_Syntax
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Infocognition
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Inner_expansion
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/MAP
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Metasyntax
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/M%3DR (M=R)
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/MU
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Metaphysical_Autology_Principle
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Mind
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Mind_Equals_Reality_Principle
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Multiplex_Unity_Principle
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Noeon
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Principle_of_Linguistic_Reducibility
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Reality
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Reality_Principle
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Requantization
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/SCSPL
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Self-Configuring_Self-Processing_Language
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Self-determinacy
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Self-multiplexing
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Self-selection
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Set_of_all_sets
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Sum_Over_Futures
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Supertautology
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Syndiffeonesis
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Syntactic_covering
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Syntactic_operator
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Syntax
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Teleological_consistency
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Teleologic_Evolution
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Telic_Principle
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Telic_recursion
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Telon
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Telor
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Theory
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Theory_of_Everything
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Three_Ms
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Triality
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Topological-descriptive_duality
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Unbound_telesis
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Unisection
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Universe_as_a_Self-Representational_Entity
= = = = = = = = =
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Cognitive-Theoretic_Model_of_the_Universe
http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Common_CTMU_objections_and_replies
http://www.thejournalofunconsciouspsychology.com/web_documents/norman_on_langan_atemp._recur.pdf
http://www.ctmu.org/Articles/Cheating_the_Millennium-final.pdf
http://www.docdroid.net/x0r6/c-m-langan-physics-and-metaphysics.pdf.html
RE: CTMU glossary (sort of) - Ostronomos - Oct 14, 2015
Thank you CC I love it! Let's hope this thread stimulates further discussion of CTMU reality and therefore reality.
RE: CTMU glossary (sort of) - Ostronomos - Oct 19, 2017
"I" existeth not in nor out but throughout
I am the love that is one in things throughout
I am good and evil none
Look inside me and you will not find me
Look within me and you will not find
Nor will I be foundeth in you.
I am He who knows only truth
I am the wiseness inbound in all things
I am the love who knowest not in concepts nor words
but in one thing, which become self-stratified to all things.
As words are only concept they have grammar
Reality is isomorphic to a description but what description it takes is
determined by one reality, however syntax creates meaning of that information
discovered to be the fabric of reality, where cognition processes information to
become infocogntion
Reality is like America, a freedom to configure itself without constraint.
Anything else by any other name would still be the same, and the freedom and constraint we experience in spirit and in material is found to be a 2-stage process. This 2-stage process is merged into one and that one then configures itself through unbound telesis (a state-recognition syntax).
hrughrughrug:
RE: CTMU glossary (sort of) - Secular Sanity - Oct 19, 2017
(Oct 19, 2017 04:18 PM)Ostronomos Wrote: Reality is like America, a freedom to configure itself without constraint.
Freedom?
Like I said, creepy.
RE: CTMU glossary (sort of) - Syne - Oct 20, 2017
The funny things is that I'd actually agree with some of this (OP)...if he didn't feel the seemingly incessant need to make up words when descriptive labels would suffice.
RE: CTMU glossary (sort of) - Secular Sanity - Oct 20, 2017
(Oct 20, 2017 05:40 AM)Syne Wrote: The funny things is that I'd actually agree with some of this (OP)...if he didn't feel the seemingly incessant need to make up words when descriptive labels would suffice.
At least you can see the resemblance.
RE: CTMU glossary (sort of) - Syne - Oct 20, 2017
(Oct 20, 2017 02:27 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote:(Oct 20, 2017 05:40 AM)Syne Wrote: The funny things is that I'd actually agree with some of this (OP)...if he didn't feel the seemingly incessant need to make up words when descriptive labels would suffice.
At least you can see the resemblance.
Hey, it's the troll again.