Casual Discussion Science Forum @scivillage
CTMU glossary (sort of) - Printable Version

+- Casual Discussion Science Forum @scivillage (//www.scivillage.com)
+-- Forum: Science (//www.scivillage.com/forum-61.html)
+--- Forum: Alternative Theories (//www.scivillage.com/forum-130.html)
+--- Thread: CTMU glossary (sort of) (/thread-1408.html)



CTMU glossary (sort of) - C C - Oct 9, 2015

Well, after all, CTMU is what triggered the creation of "Alternative Theories" here. Wink And accordingly the subforum should probably be territorially marked with it from time to time, though not necessarily in the canine fashion.

CTMU's obscure nomenclature is unremarkably dismissed as meaningless babble at SciForums. Needless to point-out, even the "in-house" terminology of many established disciplines (including physics, biology, etc) could also evoke similar responses from outsiders. Yet the esoteric appearance of those mainstream practices is excused by the majority of us prim and proletariat barbarians. Due to their words / symbols / descriptions seeming to mobilize or summon "heap big magic" in the form of cures and technological and engineering results.

CTMU might be internally consistent enough to warrant acceptance as yet another systematic metaphysical conception (of double-aspect monism). But therein lies the rub: It appears to be a philosophical scheme --> science wannabe. Some of the 18th-century spins on Plato's sensible / supersensible genre set themselves up as a prior in rank hierarchical level that simply assimilated nature and its methodological investigation, thereby avoiding doing damage to the scientific process or interfering with it. But the reverse is usually not possible (of a speculative philosophical offering literally achieving scientific status, rather than just subsume the object of the latter's study as a hyponym). The regulatory preconceptions which science operates under more or less lack tolerance for such applicants.

"Don't LOOK at anything in a physics lab, Don't TASTE anything in a chemistry lab, Don't SMELL anything in a biology lab, Don't TOUCH anything in a medical lab, and, most importantly, Don't LISTEN to anything in a philosophy department!" --Timothy Vaughn

Links to the definitions (note that even familiar terms might have eccentric usages or deviations in the context of CTMU):

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Absolute_truth

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Causality

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Closed_descriptive_manifold

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Conspansion

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Conspansive_duality

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Constructive-filtrative_duality

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Distributed_solipsism

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Distributed_syntax

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Duality_principles

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Extended_Superposition_Principle

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Generalized_cognition

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Generalized_utility

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/God

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Hology

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Holotheism

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Human_Cognitive_Syntax

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Infocognition

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Inner_expansion

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/MAP

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Metasyntax

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/M%3DR (M=R)

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/MU

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Metaphysical_Autology_Principle

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Mind

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Mind_Equals_Reality_Principle

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Multiplex_Unity_Principle

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Noeon

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Principle_of_Linguistic_Reducibility

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Reality

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Reality_Principle

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Requantization

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/SCSPL

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Self-Configuring_Self-Processing_Language

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Self-determinacy

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Self-multiplexing

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Self-selection

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Set_of_all_sets

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Sum_Over_Futures

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Supertautology

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Syndiffeonesis

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Syntactic_covering

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Syntactic_operator

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Syntax

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Teleological_consistency

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Teleologic_Evolution

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Telic_Principle

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Telic_recursion

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Telon

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Telor

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Theory

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Theory_of_Everything

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Three_Ms

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Triality

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Topological-descriptive_duality

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Unbound_telesis

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Unisection

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Universe_as_a_Self-Representational_Entity


= = = = = = = = =


http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Cognitive-Theoretic_Model_of_the_Universe

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Common_CTMU_objections_and_replies

http://www.thejournalofunconsciouspsychology.com/web_documents/norman_on_langan_atemp._recur.pdf

http://www.ctmu.org/Articles/Cheating_the_Millennium-final.pdf

http://www.docdroid.net/x0r6/c-m-langan-physics-and-metaphysics.pdf.html


RE: CTMU glossary (sort of) - Ostronomos - Oct 14, 2015

Thank you CC I love it! Let's hope this thread stimulates further discussion of CTMU reality and therefore reality.


RE: CTMU glossary (sort of) - Ostronomos - Oct 19, 2017

"I" existeth not in nor out but throughout
I am the love that is one in things throughout
I am good and evil none
Look inside me and you will not find me
Look within me and you will not find
Nor will I be foundeth in you.
I am He who knows only truth
I am the wiseness inbound in all things
I am the love who knowest not in concepts nor words
but in one thing, which become self-stratified to all things.
As words are only concept they have grammar
Reality is isomorphic to a description but what description it takes is
determined by one reality, however syntax creates meaning of that information
discovered to be the fabric of reality, where cognition processes information to
become infocogntion

Reality is like America, a freedom to configure itself without constraint.
Anything else by any other name would still be the same, and the freedom and constraint we experience in spirit and in material is found to be a 2-stage process. This 2-stage process is merged into one and that one then configures itself through unbound telesis (a state-recognition syntax).

ConfusedhrugConfusedhrugConfusedhrug:


RE: CTMU glossary (sort of) - Secular Sanity - Oct 19, 2017

(Oct 19, 2017 04:18 PM)Ostronomos Wrote: Reality is like America, a freedom to configure itself without constraint.

Freedom?

Like I said, creepy.


RE: CTMU glossary (sort of) - Syne - Oct 20, 2017

The funny things is that I'd actually agree with some of this (OP)...if he didn't feel the seemingly incessant need to make up words when descriptive labels would suffice.


RE: CTMU glossary (sort of) - Secular Sanity - Oct 20, 2017

(Oct 20, 2017 05:40 AM)Syne Wrote: The funny things is that I'd actually agree with some of this (OP)...if he didn't feel the seemingly incessant need to make up words when descriptive labels would suffice.

At least you can see the resemblance.


RE: CTMU glossary (sort of) - Syne - Oct 20, 2017

(Oct 20, 2017 02:27 PM)Secular Sanity Wrote:
(Oct 20, 2017 05:40 AM)Syne Wrote: The funny things is that I'd actually agree with some of this (OP)...if he didn't feel the seemingly incessant need to make up words when descriptive labels would suffice.

At least you can see the resemblance.

Hey, it's the troll again.