You can’t copyright AI-created art, according to US officials - Printable Version +- Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum (https://www.scivillage.com) +-- Forum: Culture (https://www.scivillage.com/forum-49.html) +--- Forum: Art & Music (https://www.scivillage.com/forum-50.html) +--- Thread: You can’t copyright AI-created art, according to US officials (/thread-11788.html) |
You can’t copyright AI-created art, according to US officials - C C - Feb 22, 2022 https://www.engadget.com/us-copyright-office-art-ai-creativity-machine-190722809.html EXCERPTS: The US Copyright Office has once again denied an effort to copyright a work of art that was created by an artificial intelligence system. Dr. Stephen Thaler attempted to copyright a piece of art titled A Recent Entrance to Paradise, claiming in a second request for reconsideration of a 2019 ruling that the USCO's “human authorship” requirement was unconstitutional. [...] the office said that current copyright law only offers protections to "the fruits of intellectual labor” that “are founded in the creative powers of the [human] mind.” As such, a copyrighted work "must be created by a human being” and the office says it won't register works “produced by a machine or mere mechanical process” that lack intervention or creative input from a human author. The agency said Thaler failed to provide evidence that A Recent Entrance to Paradise is the result of human authorship. It also stated he was unable to convince the USCO's "to depart from a century of copyright jurisprudence" — in other words, to change the rules... (MORE - missing details) |