Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

Full Version: Fascist dog whistles on social media
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
https://studybreaks.com/thoughts/fascist-dog-whistles/

"In terms of political ideologies, none receive the same kind of hatred that fascism receives. The hatred is more than deserved, of course, since the repercussions of such an ideology are still fresh in our minds. However, these fringe groups develop means to communicate and identify one another through dog whistles.

The rhetorical device is used as a coded message in order to signal one’s political stance. Fringe political groups, such as fascists, use the messages to publicly identify their political ideology without anyone outside their party understanding exactly what they’re saying.


In order to give a little context, it’s important to define fascism. Popular belief may claim that fascism promotes ethnic cleansing, which isn’t entirely true, and the malicious ideology does not present itself as such. In reality, fascism’s main tenant surrounds an ethno-nationalist worldview. Fascists believe that if countries became completely homogenized, it could lead to solving all the world’s problems.

It’s interesting that fascists often point out the ends of their goals without specifying the means. I suppose telling everyone you’re down to murder millions of people, either through mass displacement or genocide just doesn’t fly off the tongue like “we need to preserve Western culture.”


Now, before I get too heated in the midst of writing this article, I should move on to what I’m really here to write about. If you’ve seen any social media profiles of fascists, such as Richard Spencer’s, you can see that the emoji in their Twitter names change every so often.

For a while, Spencer had the okay hand gesture emoji between his first and last name as a symbol of white power. Since Trump’s recent attacks on Syria, however, Spenser has changed the emoji to Syria’s national flag in protest against Trump’s airstrike.

Richard ? Spencer
@RichardBSpencer
· Mar 23, 2017
Replying to @RichardBSpencer @sashajol
Then some Alt-Right kids go publicly guzzle milk on Shia leBoeuf's live stream HWNDU. Milk becomes "a thing."


Richard ? Spencer
@RichardBSpencer
Like Pepe, milk is now a symbol of White identity, both ironical and serious.

The frog is meant to represent Pepe the Frog, a popular character in a series of comics by Matt Furie, who’s been appropriated by internet hate groups as a symbol of their movement. The milk emoji is also meant to represent white nationalism and white pride in general.

Not only do these people use modern symbols for their dog whistles, but they also utilize ancient Viking runes as a means to identify their political ideology. One such symbol is the Odal rune, meaning “heritage.”


Another is the Tyr rune, which means “warrior.” Not unlike how the Nazis appropriated the swastika, modern fascists wish to appropriate ancient symbols to represent their own political movement.

In the case of the runes, however, things start to become very complicated. The symbols have been around far longer than fascism, and many neo-pagan groups use these runes to proclaim their religious beliefs.

So, to be clear, just because someone uses the OK hand gesture emoji or doodles Viking runes in the margins of their birth charts doesn’t make them a fascist. To really know if someone is part of that ideology, people need to conduct more research.

The dog whistles used by fascists don’t stop at symbols, however. Members of the fringe political group also use punctuation to try and get their points across. One example lies in their use of parentheses, particularly when presented as “((( ))).”


They use the typographical tactic, known as echoing, in conjunction with a person’s name, such as “((( Mel Brooks ))),” to indicate that the writer understands this person to be Jewish. This particular dog-whistle shows up a lot in online, anti-semitic rhetoric.

Another prominent hate-symbol comes in the form of “14/88” or “8814.” Each number in this numeric dog whistle represents two specific facets of the fascist agenda. The number 14 represents their 14-word slogan: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.” The number 88 is code for “heil Hitler” since the letter H is the eighth letter of the alphabet.
Irony also plays a large role in fascist dog whistling, notably through the form of sarcastic jokes. One popular meme that went around for a while was the phrase “Hitler did nothing wrong.” In fact, Mountain Dew once set up an online poll to find a title for their new soft-drink, and the aforementioned user-nominated phrase rested at the top of the list.

That said, insensitive jokes not only trivialize the atrocities committed by Nazi Germany, but they can also elicit facetious responses in the forms of dog whistles.

One coded message that can be a reply to this “sarcastic” meme is a claim that those who suffered through the horrors of the Holocaust were free of lice. This facetious comment isn’t just an edgy joke for the alt-right.


Rather, it’s a dog whistle that holocaust deniers use to identify one another. Those who believe the holocaust never happened take on the notion that the gas-chambers were meant to rid the prisoners of lice and not meant for mass murder.

Dog whistles are, in nature, difficult to discern. The phrases and symbols constantly change as more and more people start to understand their true meanings. It takes constant vigilance and determination to keep up with the encoded terminology of modern fascists.

Let it be known that this kind of political leaning only reveals its sinister nature when it’s already too late. Keep an eye out for any and all encoded hate speech so that you too can identify fascists and, subsequently, put them in their place."
If you can definitively discern a "dog whistle" by who uses it, like an unabashed white supremacist such as Richard Spencer, then it is not a "dog whistle". Like the neo-Nazis who march down the street, those people aren't hiding their beliefs. And jumping at "dog whistle" bogeymen by accusing people who innocently use the okay hand gesture or appreciate Western ideals or their own heritage, especially when eager to do so against political opposition, is intellectually dishonest, at best, and outright immoral, at worst.

And branding innocuous things as solely endemic of a hateful ideology is a good way to let them win, by progressively and voluntarily curtailing your own speech/actions. If things like Pepe the frog are supposedly only white supremacist, then you cede to them a way to spread their hate. It's like people are voluntarily providing them with branding for recruitment.

What do I care if racists manage to talk to each other? Freedom of speech only matters if it protects speech I do not like, and refusal to protect speech is, itself, fascist. Don't become the monsters you fight.


And more than like, they're just trolling you anyway...just to get the attention articles like this give them. Notoriety is a commodity to these people.
(Mar 21, 2019 02:16 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]If you can definitively discern a "dog whistle" by who uses it, like an unabashed white supremacist such as Richard Spencer, then it is not a "dog whistle". Like the neo-Nazis who march down the street, those people aren't hiding their beliefs. And jumping at "dog whistle" bogeymen by accusing people who innocently use the okay hand gesture or appreciate Western ideals or their own heritage, especially when eager to do so against political opposition, is intellectually dishonest, at best, and outright immoral, at worst.

And branding innocuous things as solely endemic of a hateful ideology is a good way to let them win, by progressively and voluntarily curtailing your own speech/actions. If things like Pepe the frog are supposedly only white supremacist, then you cede to them a way to spread their hate. It's like people are voluntarily providing them with branding for recruitment.

What do I care if racists manage to talk to each other? Freedom of speech only matters if it protects speech I do not like, and refusal to protect speech is, itself, fascist. Don't become the monsters you fight.


And more than like, they're just trolling you anyway...just to get the attention articles like this give them. Notoriety is a commodity to these people.

There's nothing wrong with educating people about the dog whistles fascists use to signal to each other on social media. More knowledge is always a good thing. Here's some more:

https://medium.com/@DeoTasDevil/the-rhet...bca3caeb84
(Mar 21, 2019 02:26 AM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]There's nothing wrong with educating people about the dog whistles fascists use to signal to each other on social media. More knowledge is always a good thing. Here's some more:

https://medium.com/@DeoTasDevil/the-rhet...bca3caeb84

There is harm when people get the false impression that white supremacy is more prevalent than it actually is, because they see "dog whistle" bogeymen everywhere. When people mistakenly believe an ideology is more prevalent they are emboldened to act upon it, whether by attacking a mosque or as an excuse to attack political foes. And many supposed "dog whistles" are just partisan cudgels intended to scare their constituency (i.e. common enemy, othering). For instance, "state's rights" is a fundamental feature of a constitutional republic and tradition, Christian, and nationalism are not, themselves, bad things nor exclusively espoused by white supremacists. They even list your pacifist isolationism. And America first, anti-multicultural, anti-globalist, anti-PC, and anti-SJW are not exclusive to racists either. These are all ways to dishonestly paint political opponents as racists...which makes idiots believe that half the country is white supremacist. And only a moron doesn't understand how real white supremacists love the added coverage and falsely inflated numbers.

And the people who most dishonestly accuse people of "dog whistles" are the leftists who talk a good game until it's a Republican woman they hurl sexist insults at, a Republican black or Jew that they sling racist tropes at, or even just poor and minority children being bought in to diversity their own children's schools.
(Mar 21, 2019 04:39 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]
(Mar 21, 2019 02:26 AM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]There's nothing wrong with educating people about the dog whistles fascists use to signal to each other on social media. More knowledge is always a good thing. Here's some more:

https://medium.com/@DeoTasDevil/the-rhet...bca3caeb84

There is harm when people get the false impression that white supremacy is more prevalent than it actually is, because they see "dog whistle" bogeymen everywhere. When people mistakenly believe an ideology is more prevalent they are emboldened to act upon it, whether by attacking a mosque or as an excuse to attack political foes. And many supposed "dog whistles" are just partisan cudgels intended to scare their constituency (i.e. common enemy, othering). For instance, "state's rights" is a fundamental feature of a constitutional republic and tradition, Christian, and nationalism are not, themselves, bad things nor exclusively espoused by white supremacists. They even list your pacifist isolationism. And America first, anti-multicultural, anti-globalist, anti-PC, and anti-SJW are not exclusive to racists either. These are all ways to dishonestly paint political opponents as racists...which makes idiots believe that half the country is white supremacist. And only a moron doesn't understand how real white supremacists love the added coverage and falsely inflated numbers.

And the people who most dishonestly accuse people of "dog whistles" are the leftists who talk a good game until it's a Republican woman they hurl sexist insults at, a Republican black or Jew that they sling racist tropes at, or even just poor and minority children being bought in to diversity their own children's schools.

LOL! Uh no..Knowing the dogwhistles of your enemy is always an advantage. Every time and for every one. There is simply no question about this, your alt right bullshit of protecting your cohorts notwithstanding.
(Mar 21, 2019 04:42 AM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]
(Mar 21, 2019 04:39 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]There is harm when people get the false impression that white supremacy is more prevalent than it actually is, because they see "dog whistle" bogeymen everywhere. When people mistakenly believe an ideology is more prevalent they are emboldened to act upon it, whether by attacking a mosque or as an excuse to attack political foes. And many supposed "dog whistles" are just partisan cudgels intended to scare their constituency (i.e. common enemy, othering). For instance, "state's rights" is a fundamental feature of a constitutional republic and tradition, Christian, and nationalism are not, themselves, bad things nor exclusively espoused by white supremacists. They even list your pacifist isolationism. And America first, anti-multicultural, anti-globalist, anti-PC, and anti-SJW are not exclusive to racists either. These are all ways to dishonestly paint political opponents as racists...which makes idiots believe that half the country is white supremacist. And only a moron doesn't understand how real white supremacists love the added coverage and falsely inflated numbers.

And the people who most dishonestly accuse people of "dog whistles" are the leftists who talk a good game until it's a Republican woman they hurl sexist insults at, a Republican black or Jew that they sling racist tropes at, or even just poor and minority children being bought in to diversity their own children's schools.

LOL! Uh no..Knowing the dogwhistles of your enemy is always an advantage. There is simply no question about this, your alt right bullshit notwithstanding.

And there it is...the exact leftist dishonesty I was just talking about. You've been so brainwashed that you don't even seem to recognize a difference between those on the right and those on the so-called alt-right. You crap your pants over a myth about half the country being white supremacists, all while supporting policies that harm minorities far more than the impotent racist fringe could ever hope for. That's why your own cited article said "hiding their identities claiming that they are “normal” / “centrists” / “moderates” / “liberals”." People use your fear to make you support policies that will never accomplish their expressed goals.
(Mar 21, 2019 05:01 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]
(Mar 21, 2019 04:42 AM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]
(Mar 21, 2019 04:39 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]There is harm when people get the false impression that white supremacy is more prevalent than it actually is, because they see "dog whistle" bogeymen everywhere. When people mistakenly believe an ideology is more prevalent they are emboldened to act upon it, whether by attacking a mosque or as an excuse to attack political foes. And many supposed "dog whistles" are just partisan cudgels intended to scare their constituency (i.e. common enemy, othering). For instance, "state's rights" is a fundamental feature of a constitutional republic and tradition, Christian, and nationalism are not, themselves, bad things nor exclusively espoused by white supremacists. They even list your pacifist isolationism. And America first, anti-multicultural, anti-globalist, anti-PC, and anti-SJW are not exclusive to racists either. These are all ways to dishonestly paint political opponents as racists...which makes idiots believe that half the country is white supremacist. And only a moron doesn't understand how real white supremacists love the added coverage and falsely inflated numbers.

And the people who most dishonestly accuse people of "dog whistles" are the leftists who talk a good game until it's a Republican woman they hurl sexist insults at, a Republican black or Jew that they sling racist tropes at, or even just poor and minority children being bought in to diversity their own children's schools.

LOL! Uh no..Knowing the dogwhistles of your enemy is always an advantage. There is simply no question about this, your alt right bullshit notwithstanding.

And there it is...the exact leftist dishonesty I was just talking about. You've been so brainwashed that you don't even seem to recognize a difference between those on the right and those on the so-called alt-right. You crap your pants over a myth about half the country being white supremacists, all while supporting policies that harm minorities far more than the impotent racist fringe could ever hope for. That's why your own cited article said "hiding their identities claiming that they are “normal” / “centrists” / “moderates” / “liberals”." People use your fear to make you support policies that will never accomplish their expressed goals.

Bitch bitch bitch. Now the white supremacists are the fault of the left. lol! Everything you say is a tired alt right talking point. Don't you ever think for yourself?
(Mar 21, 2019 05:22 AM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]
(Mar 21, 2019 05:01 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]
(Mar 21, 2019 04:42 AM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]LOL! Uh no..Knowing the dogwhistles of your enemy is always an advantage. There is simply no question about this, your alt right bullshit notwithstanding.

And there it is...the exact leftist dishonesty I was just talking about. You've been so brainwashed that you don't even seem to recognize a difference between those on the right and those on the so-called alt-right. You crap your pants over a myth about half the country being white supremacists, all while supporting policies that harm minorities far more than the impotent racist fringe could ever hope for. That's why your own cited article said "hiding their identities claiming that they are “normal” / “centrists” / “moderates” / “liberals”." People use your fear to make you support policies that will never accomplish their expressed goals.

Bitch bitch bitch. Now the white supremacists are the fault of the left. lol! Everything you say is a tired alt right talking point. Don't you ever think for yourself?

Then manage to support any of your claims...for once. You obviously can't distinguish right from alt-right, can't show any source for the talking point I'm supposedly aping, and only seem able to demonstrate exact the point I just made.
So, as usual, you can't manage to support, or really even make, your own arguments.
Pages: 1 2