Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

Full Version: 7 bad science and health ideas that should die with 2018
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2...iment-juul

INTRO: If you’re a science enthusiast who has followed the news in 2018, you’ve probably noted a few moments when science got the shaft. In 2018 alone, there was the freeze on important HIV science involving fetal cell tissue, the defunding of Planned Parenthood, White House interference in an international breastfeeding resolution for women’s health, the elimination of a science adviser’s office at the Environmental Protection Agency, and all the rollbacks of environmental protections at EPA and Interior, backed by a White House trying to downplay two major climate science reports. Plus, Goop continues to thrive, and Dr. Oz became a White House health council adviser.

At the Vox science desk, we like to close each year with a list of ideas we think should die by January 1. For posterity, here’s our 2018 hit list. (See previous versions of this year-end list here and here.)

COVERED:

Myth 1: fighting climate change will destroy the economy

Myth 2: Juuling is cool

Myth 3: Neanderthals were more savage than us

Myth 4: the marshmallow test is a key test of future success and well-being

Myth 5: immigrants pose a disease risk to the US

Myth 6: mere exposure to other points of view reduces partisanship

Myth 7: the Stanford Prison Experiment shows how environments can bring out evil in people

MORE (details): https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2...iment-juul
#1: All proposed strategies to make a significant dent in climate change would destroy the economy, and no one has proposed one that would both have an appreciable effect without a huge negative economic impact.
#3: Ah, the myth of the "noble savage", driven by the ideological belief that man is inherently good and only modernity has corrupted us.