Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

Full Version: Proposed Radical Change in the Definition of 'Planet'
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
We are all aware that Pluto was demoted from 'planet' to 'dwarf planet' years ago. Well, Pluto's planet status might be restored, if a new proposal is adopted by the International Astronomical Union (which decides on such things).

The new definition of 'planet' would not only restore Pluto, it would acknowledge some 100 new planets in our solar system, including the earth's moon!

The idea is that planets should be defined by their own physical properties, their geophysics as it were, rather than by their orbital characteristics. So a 'planet' would become a matter of what kind of body it is, not what kind of orbit it  has. If this proposal is adopted,  it will no longer be necessary that the objects orbit a star. Objects (moons) orbiting larger planets would count as planets too, if they have enough gravity to form into spheres but are not massive enough to initiate fusion. (Would brown dwarfs be included in that?) It would also make room in the planet definition for 'rogue planets' that probably exist in the darkness of interstellar space not associated with any particular star.

http://www.sciencealert.com/nasa-scienti...everything

http://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2017/pdf/1448.pdf
There will be a lot of happy school children over this news. They wanted Pluto to stay a planet. Unfortunately it won't be as easy to name all the planets in our solar system now. Good bye favorite Jeopardy questions..
No Planet left behind.
Poor Pluto...

It even has a giant heart on the side of it, crying out 'Please love me!'

But astronomers didn't care.

[Image: Pluto-01_Stern_03_Pluto_Color_TXT.jpg]