Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

1.] The mind exists at individual points in metric space but shares a single point in sub-space. This would explain why non local mind can exist.
2.] The human brain resonates between material and immaterial levels of reality. Reality has its own frequency because it IS energy.
3.] The world and the body appear within consciousness, rather than the other way around.
4.] The higher dimension contains the separation, effecting the non-separation.
5.] When man is unprotected he will become prey to a type of logic that resides in reality(the thing we incorrectly believe can only be perceived and not mind connection that fills our flesh and blood bodies as well as everything else and thus results in non-separation and hence limitlessness).
6.] Self and non-self or God and non-God merge to become the one that distributes over the one.
7.] I am as sure of this as the shortest distance between A and B must be a straight line.
8.] Every conscious being is one conscious being existing in parallel, experiencing themselves as a separate and distinct lifeform.
9.] Mind = Reality = Language. Reality enters the mind in the form of language or information.
10.] Reality is self-perceptual. Reality observes itself.
11.] Death is an illusion of change. Whereas objects exist within time and space, reality does not.
12.] Reality is the set of all things that exist. This, as we can see, leads to the self-inclusion paradox. Reality is the subset as well as the powerset of itself.
13.] Non-separation is also known as unity by spirit
14.] God is not apparent in the matter we perceive. Therefore, as elusive as God is, He can only be known through logic and mathematics. Less so empiricism.
15.] Two things are different because they have at least one similarity in common, namely that they are both real.
16.] Your nature is identical to the universe's syntactic structure.
17.] Observation creates reality.
18.] By way of our very existence, we become creators of possibility.

Quote:17.] Observation creates reality.

It's interesting to me that the two most successful theories in physics, the theory of relativity and quantum theory, posit the observer at the crux of events. In Einstein's case it's an inertial frame or non-moving clock measurement. In quantum theory's case it's the measurement/observation of the wave function. But measurement is unintelligible outside of being an event of abstraction. It is not an objective physical event that takes place in spacetime but rather an informational event in reality itself. In this sense it does seem to "create" or concurrently instantiate reality.

"It from bit symbolizes the idea that every item of the physical world has at bottom — at a very deep bottom, in most instance — an immaterial source and explanation; that what we call reality arises in the last analysis from the posing of yes-no questions and the registering of equipment-evoked responses; in short, that all things physical are information-theoretic in origin and this is a participatory universe."--- The Search for Links — John Archibald Wheeler

Langan's impeccable logic makes a compelling case for reality theory:

An exploration of reality featuring Kurt J:

In this most cruel and bloodthirsty of centuries, we are in danger of not only failing to understand evil, but of denying its very existence.
- Jordan B. Peterson

This quote was used in an argument in favor of God by J.B. Peterson. The horrors perpetrated in the 20th century were unforgettable. The atheist falls into the category of those who fail to grasp the brute fact of evil. Simply because evil, and its opposite, cements the high likelihood of an omnipotent God within our psyche. Those of us who are seasoned in the art of life, know that God is a high likelihood. This is because logic and empiricism leads to the conclusion of a God. And faith is merely a substitute for logic.

The Hammer said:
Which God, possessing which attributes, are we discussing?

Edit: I say this because a Christian, a Hindu and a Polytheist may all have different opinions of the problem of evil and it's applicability.

Classically it's used to challenge the three part omni-god (benevolent, potent, knowledge)

This reads suspiciously like that of a confused yet defiant atheist. Omnipotence - as logic dictates - preceded intelligent lifeforms who then conceived of it. Anyone in this day and age who remains in the dark regarding the absolute truth (unbiased truth) of the existence of God (a primordial entity or universal consciousness which I have witnessed numerous times) is utterly confused.