Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

Quote:And that's what skeptics are waiting for. Actual evidence, in hand. Not hearsay and iffy images.

Waiting around and mocking all presented evidence. Meanwhile the true UAP researchers are studying the phenomena and reaching groundbreaking conclusions. Like this one:

"A Stanford professor with 300 published papers and a history of government-commissioned research has gone on record with a claim that should be dominating every science headline on the planet: something nonhuman has been here for a very long time, it operates with intelligence, and in some cases it appears to have a sense of humor.
​
Dr. Garry Nolan is not a fringe voice. He is a decorated immunologist who was recruited to evaluate intelligence officers suffering from unexplained neurological injuries linked to UAP encounters. When a scientist at that level says nonhuman intelligence is real and present, the question is no longer whether to believe him. The question is why his colleagues are looking the other way.
​
Nolan has described the observed phenomena in precise terms. The craft are not human. They act with clear intelligence and deliberate intent. And in documented cases, their behaviour has included what witnesses and researchers can only describe as playful or deliberately confusing responses to human observation.
​
He has gone further than almost any credentialed scientist has dared. Nolan argues that nonhuman intelligence appears to be operating with a mastery of physics that sits completely outside human equations. The phenomena are not random. They are not misidentified weather. Something is demonstrating principles that human science cannot currently account for.
​
The mainstream scientific community has largely refused to engage. Nolan's own words capture the problem directly: researchers are ignoring extraordinary data because it does not fit existing models. The data gets discarded before it gets examined.
​
Government insiders have pointed to reverse engineering programs operating in classified facilities for decades. Congressional testimony has referenced materials and craft of nonhuman origin held in undisclosed locations. Nolan's work puts a Stanford-credentialed scientific framework around claims that governments have been slow-walking toward the public for years.
​
Some researchers believe the nonhuman presence is extraterrestrial in origin, representing a civilisation that has been monitoring or interacting with humanity across centuries. Others argue the phenomenon may be non-biological, a form of intelligence without a body, possibly operating across dimensions of reality that human physics has not yet mapped.
​
If a Stanford professor with direct government access believes nonhuman intelligence is here, has been here a long time, and is demonstrating physics humanity cannot explain, what exactly are we waiting for before we take this seriously?"

A "claim" only supported by an appeal to authority, is still just a claim.
Where's Weinstein's Era B?

Here I thought someone was becoming a little more reasonable. 9_9

Nolan explains evidence vs proof of uap and NHIs...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N73kvWOsG8Q&t=217s

The next drop..

https://www.facebook.com/reel/945857928443323

Triangle of lights photographed during Apollo 17's visit to the moon:

Jeremy Corbell on the possible release of the 46 clear uap videos..

https://www.facebook.com/reel/2038402330080036

The stars are too far apart to be what we see in the photo.

Nope..too far apart as I just showed. And the close up photo of the uaps reveals them to be lights not stars.
And the lights were moving:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ufo-files-a...2-mission/