Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

Full Version: Most older people in England view climate change as a serious risk (UK community)
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1119482

INTRO: Six out of 10 older people in England view climate change as a serious risk, with only one in 17 (5.8%) dismissive of climate change concerns, according to a new study led by UCL (University College London) researchers.

The study, published in The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, looked at survey responses from 6,572 people in England aged 50 and over who were asked to rate their agreement or disagreement with statements about climate change.

Analysing these responses, the research team classed most respondents as highly engaged (30%) or engaged (31%) with climate change risk. Just over a quarter of respondents were ambivalent or uncertain (22%), while smaller percentages of older people identified as risk-aware but fatalistic (11%) and dismissive (5.8%).

Those in their 50s were more likely to be highly engaged, while those in their 70s, 80s and older were more likely to be risk-aware but fatalistic – that is, aware of the adverse consequences of climate change but believing it is too late to do anything about it.

Lead author Dr Giorgio Di Gessa (UCL Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care) said: “It is often assumed that older generations do not care about climate change – but our study shows this is not the case. Most older adults are concerned about the climate. They believe climate change is happening and has not been exaggerated and view it as severe enough to warrant action. Only a small minority are dismissive of the issue.

“Older adults in the UK are also a diverse group. For people seeking to increase engagement on climate change, a one-size-fits-all message won’t work. For instance, those who are uncertain may need clearer, more relatable information, while those who are fatalistic may need practical examples of what still can be done.” (MORE - details, no ads)
C2 must have been surveyed.
(Yesterday 11:07 PM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]C2 must have been surveyed.

Things aren't always what they seem to be.

From an engineering point of view .. CO2 production is a rough and ready indication of efficiency .. in particular thermodynamic efficiency but probably much more. For an engineer waste is ugly .. in an of itself it is symptomatic of a machine or thing that needs to be fixed. For others .. waste is beautiful.. shiny new cars in the drive .. full trash bins .. a yellow sulfurous  haze in the air ..  great joy.

From a BBC report of 29 July 2025.. How Trump's loathing for wind turbines started with a Scottish court battle..
Quote:.. Five years before he first became US president, it [in Scotland] was one of his earliest interventions on renewable energy - but since then his opposition to them has grown to become government policy in the world's biggest economy.
.. [More recently] Before making the transatlantic crossing for his Scottish summer jaunt, the US president urged the UK to "get rid of the windmills and bring back the oil".

More: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c15l3knp4xyo

Trump isn't the first to try tilting at windmills and he probably won't be the last.

Meanwhile.. just waiting for time to fix Trump.