Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

Full Version: Trump threatens 10% tariffs to Nato allies over Greenland deal
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
"Army Recognition" is based in Belgium, so more perspective from the continent itself. Denmark has long been well aware of the global focus on Greenland, getting solicitations from more than just Trump. Hanging onto sovereignty because it wants to remain the salient player at the center of that attention, controlling the gateway.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

(Aug, 2025) How Greenland makes Denmark indispensable to NATO’s Arctic strategy
https://www.armyrecognition.com/focus-an...c-strategy

EXCERPTS: The contract signed by Denmark’s Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organization (FMI) with the Swedish company T-KARTOR to deliver new flight charts for the ice-free areas of Greenland might appear minor at first glance...

[...] For Copenhagen, securing accurate and updated aeronautical charts is not just about aviation safety. It is part of a broader effort to guarantee sovereignty over a vast and remote region that defines Denmark’s role as an Arctic power. With the Royal Danish Air Force relying on these maps to conduct patrols, surveillance, and search-and-rescue missions, the ability to fly at lower altitudes and operate more effectively strengthens the country’s presence in a territory that is central to NATO’s northern flank.

Greenland’s importance extends well beyond Danish defense. The island sits at the crossroads of global strategic interests. As Arctic sea ice continues to retreat, new maritime routes are gradually opening. [...] Even though these routes remain hazardous and commercially uncertain, the prospect alone has drawn the attention of major powers, making Greenland a natural point of interest in future Arctic shipping governance.

[...] Meanwhile, Russia has stepped up its Arctic military presence, reinforcing bases along its northern coast and conducting naval operations. China has expressed interest as well, focusing on Greenland’s mineral wealth and potential role in future trade routes, even if its projects have often faced political resistance or economic setbacks. [...] Western states see Greenland as an opportunity to diversify supply chains and reduce dependence on China.

[...] In this context, Denmark’s investment in flight charts acquires symbolic significance. It reflects a commitment to safeguard sovereignty in the Arctic, strengthen NATO’s northern defenses, and ensure that operations over Greenland remain safe and effective...

As climate change accelerates and great power rivalry intensifies, Greenland’s role will only grow. What may seem like a routine defense procurement is, in fact, a reminder that the Arctic is no longer a peripheral theater but a central arena of global competition. For Denmark, ensuring control and operational capacity in Greenland is not only about today’s security needs but also about maintaining influence in a region where the balance of power is rapidly shifting.
Why don’t you guys just state the obvious. Davos is a curated menu. We’re not in the audience, nor do we have backstage passes, but we live with the consequences. Elites don’t fear activism, criticism, or even unrest. They fear the loss of controlling the narrative.
Since Trump basically snubbed Davos last year, I assume he just when to negotiate/cudgel weakling Europeans.
(Jan 23, 2026 01:41 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]Since Trump basically snubbed Davos last year, I assume he just when to negotiate/cudgel weakling Europeans.

He attended a virtual meeting in 2025.

Zelensky parroted his attitude towards Europeans, but Zelensky's "Servant of the People," feels unusually on-the-nose for the "all the world is but a stage" vibe.

It’s a mix of public virtue signaling and private power brokering. Long-time attendees emphasize that the real action happens behind closed doors. A lot of Davos is very much behind the scenes.
In terms of working with the US, I'd consider a virtual speech a snub... no opportunities to negotiate with the president directly.

The US got lucky with their actor president. Zelenskyy seem more about assuaging an actor's need for attention.
(Jan 23, 2026 06:35 AM)Yazata Wrote: [ -> ]https://x.com/xerias_x/status/2014338006598005001

LOL!
Ancestry.com saying my DNA 8% Danish. Don’t feel Danish, Danish pastry is ok. Somewhere along the way, an ancestor of mine had a dalliance with some English gal or guy. Even had to have surgery to correct Viking’s Disease(Dupytrens contracture) and aka Rower’s Disease. The English connection is intriguing because I would assume many North Americans have English DNA too. I wonder how many have the Danish connection? Even my wife, who is Dutch, is 11% Danish, who knew? Btw, she’s not a Danish pastry lover.

Always thought the Vikings were Norwegian. Do the NA’s or the Dutch having Danish DNA mean the Norwegians have it too? All of Scandinavia? No wonder they support Denmark. Row, row, row your boat.
(Jan 23, 2026 02:28 PM)Zinjanthropos Wrote: [ -> ]Ancestry.com saying my DNA 8% Danish. Don’t feel Danish, Danish pastry is ok. Somewhere along the way, an ancestor of mine had a dalliance with some English gal or guy. Even had to have surgery to correct Viking’s Disease(Dupytrens contracture) and aka Rower’s Disease. The English connection is intriguing because I would assume many North Americans have English DNA too. I wonder how many have the Danish connection? Even my wife, who is Dutch, is 11% Danish, who knew? Btw, she’s not a Danish pastry lover.

Always thought the Vikings were Norwegian. Do the NA’s or the Dutch having Danish DNA mean the Norwegians have it too? All of Scandinavia? No wonder they support Denmark. Row, row, row your boat.

"Viking" residentially applied to all of Scandinavia back then. Norse when just Norway, but that's contingently abused at times to reference all Vikings. The Varangian Viking branch traveled along the Volga river and the Dnieper slash Dniester rivers trade routes, and Prince Rurik established the state of "Kievan Rus". That's one connection to Ukraine (as well as Russia and Belarus). They also made it to Constantinople. The Varangians were originally primarily from Sweden, but also groups from Denmark and Norway, too.
Makes sense now, sort of….my mother with the Ukrainian bloodline and my father English with a dash of Dane. I’ll wager then that there are a great deal of Amerks with Scandinavian/Danish ancestry and who knows, even Trump himself.

Enuf of that. I do recognize Greenland as strategically important as far as militarily speaking. It’s this left or right stuff that has me head scratching. Tend to think ambiguity for most, can see both arguments but not so much the extreme ends of the spectrum. Not very politically minded here, not as involved like some folks. Not that I don’t care, just not something I take too seriously as a discussion topic. Big world with lots of opinions.

Here’s an article from factcheck.org based in Philadelphia. Just from reading it I sensed they leaned more to the left. It seems nowadays anything that corrects or challenges what Trump says is leftist. Seems to be a given. Being Republican or Democrat also doesn’t seem to matter when it comes to accusing. I call direction taking, crossing the party line and we have it here in Canada also so I figure it’s universal, although somewhat risky at times or suicidal in other areas of the planet. It’s about Greenland…

https://www.factcheck.org/2026/01/trumps...greenland/

Seems left so I checked with these guys not knowing if they’re R or L, assuming each org is one or the other.

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/fac...media-bias

Verdict: Left. At least I got one right, no pun intended. Who judges this author?
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5