Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

Full Version: The rise of AI denialism
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
https://bigthink.com/the-present/the-ris...denialism/

EXCERPTS: By any objective measure, AI continues to improve at a stunning pace....

[...] So why has the public latched onto the narrative that AI is stalling, that the output is slop, and that the AI boom is just another tech bubble that lacks justifiable use-cases? I believe it’s because society is collectively entering the first stage of grief — denial — over the very scary possibility that we humans may soon lose cognitive supremacy to artificial systems.

Believe me, I know this future is hard to accept. I’ve been writing about the destabilizing and demoralizing risks of superintelligence for well over a decade, and I also feel overwhelmed by the changes racing toward us.

[...] The fact is, today’s frontier models are remarkably capable and are on a rapid path towards rivaling human professionals across most fields. It will transform how organizations operate, how governments function, how science advances, how engineering gets done, how militaries strategize, and how education is deployed.

It will also create terrifying new risks that we are not dealing with, like the potential for AI to manipulate individuals with superhuman effectiveness. Whether we like it or not, AI will change everything... (MORE - details)
(Dec 2, 2025 05:09 PM)C C Wrote: [ -> ]https://bigthink.com/the-present/the-ris...denialism/

EXCERPTS: By any objective measure, AI continues to improve at a stunning pace....

[...] So why has the public latched onto the narrative that AI is stalling, that the output is slop, and that the AI boom is just another tech bubble that lacks justifiable use-cases? I believe it’s because society is collectively entering the first stage of grief — denial — over the very scary possibility that we humans may soon lose cognitive supremacy to artificial systems.

Believe me, I know this future is hard to accept. I’ve been writing about the destabilizing and demoralizing risks of superintelligence for well over a decade, and I also feel overwhelmed by the changes racing toward us.

[...] The fact is, today’s frontier models are remarkably capable and are on a rapid path towards rivaling human professionals across most fields. It will transform how organizations operate, how governments function, how science advances, how engineering gets done, how militaries strategize, and how education is deployed.

It will also create terrifying new risks that we are not dealing with, like the potential for AI to manipulate individuals with superhuman effectiveness. Whether we like it or not, AI will change everything... (MORE - details)

This guy is ‘the girl in the jar’. Dangerous as hell. If around at many of man’s greatest accomplishments, he probably would’ve professed an end of the world prophesy for humanity. He'd likely find fault in the wheel, the internal combustion engine, flight, and the personal computer, just to name a few. Depressing fellow.
(Dec 2, 2025 05:09 PM)C C Wrote: [ -> ]EXCERPTS: By any objective measure, AI continues to improve at a stunning pace....

[...] So why has the public latched onto the narrative that AI is stalling, that the output is slop, and that the AI boom is just another tech bubble that lacks justifiable use-cases? I believe it’s because society is collectively entering the first stage of grief — denial — over the very scary possibility that we humans may soon lose cognitive supremacy to artificial systems.

Sure, it must be everyone's lying eyes. Or:

Dr. Louis B. Rosenberg is a computer scientist and current CEO of Unanimous AI, a California company focused on amplifying human intelligence using AI algorithms modeled on biological swarms.
- https://bigthink.com/people/louis-rosenberg/

There's an obvious conflict of interest in this article. He's just trying to bolster his own tech bubble.

Many of these companies have taken on loans or investors with the promise of an AI revolution. If that promise doesn't pay off, they're ruined.
Let's guess the average AI user actually uses 100ms of cpu time every month. So selling those 25 million slots to 25 million users for (say) $20 a month brings in about $500 million per month or £6 billion a year. In reality a lot of the reasons for using AI involve access to the database which only Google has .. so Google inevitably wins. Being able to follow people and their money is worth a lot to governments and many private companies .. in real time .. which an AI can do.
No new technology entrepeneur ever went broke overestimating the mental laziness of the human species.