I've known about this video for years seeing it on numerous paranormal shows. Looks totally authentic and so far nobody has debunked it. Maybe one of the best captures of a ghost in a daylit outdoor setting. It's abit sad though that child ghosts are evidently running around cemeteries in the afterlife..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C38ZvJjqX4c
Very low quality video on an extremely low quality YouTube upload.
I refer to AI once again
Quote: Ghost images on film at night, often mistaken for paranormal activity, are typically caused by technical issues like lens flare, reflections, motion blur, and low-light distortions, rather than actual ghosts according to Pro-Vigil. These artifacts can be exacerbated by inadequate lighting, improper camera angles, and reflective surfaces.
When they add the creepy noises and music to the supposed evidence of the supernatural it’s hard to take it seriously. It’s telling me that the whole thing is strictly for entertainment purposes. Add getting the vid aka evidence copyrighted and it loses credibility. All about making money.
Quote:Ghost images on film at night, often mistaken for paranormal activity, are typically caused by technical issues like lens flare, reflections, motion blur, and low-light distortions, rather than actual ghosts according to Pro-Vigil. These artifacts can be exacerbated by inadequate lighting, improper camera angles, and reflective surfaces.
LOL Well I guess we can rule all that out then since this video was taken in broad daylight.
(Jul 21, 2025 11:32 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:Ghost images on film at night, often mistaken for paranormal activity, are typically caused by technical issues like lens flare, reflections, motion blur, and low-light distortions, rather than actual ghosts according to Pro-Vigil. These artifacts can be exacerbated by inadequate lighting, improper camera angles, and reflective surfaces.
LOL Well I guess we can rule all that out then since this video was taken in broad daylight.
I guess the ornamental street lights on at 1:10 are meant to fool people into thinking it’s night. Could be the whole explanation. The camera was not set correctly and night and day image affected. Can you prove it was at night and not a camera malfunction? Pretty simple. All you need is brightness setting to be off to make night look like day.
Just typical low quality video artifacts.
You know it's weak evidence when they have to take so long priming the viewer before showing it... and often during and after as well. The gullible, easily suggestible fall for it.
Quote:I guess the ornamental street lights on at 1:10 are meant to fool people into thinking it’s night.
Or maybe just dumbasses who can't tell daytime from nightime..
Quote:The camera was not set correctly and night and day image affected. Can you prove it was at night and not a camera malfunction?
I see..So NOT a hoax after all like you were claiming but a camera malfunction. You're the one claiming it was at night when we can clearly see it is daytime. Are you drinking now?
(Jul 22, 2025 12:06 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]Just typical low quality video artifacts.
You know it's weak evidence when they have to take so long priming the viewer before showing it... and often during and after as well. The gullible, easily suggestible fall for it.
Ah yes..the old "the camera is making up something that wasn't really there" ruse. It's always the last ditch effort of all wannabe debunkers. Like sneaky senile interloper ladies and violent deer home invasions.
Poor, sad little MR. You have to keep making up straw men because you can't dispute the actual argument.
If only you knew anything about video codecs, artifacts, lens artifacts, etc.. Just a lot of gullible arguments from ignorance.
Video or compression artifacts don't create something that's not there. They distort the video of something that is already there. Lens artifacts otoh require bright light effects like flare or ghosting, which is clearly lacking in the video. Any other impressive sounding words you wanna use that you know nothing about it?
Again, it's only your pathetic straw man that anyone said nothing was there. See how hard you have to work to deny simple video artifacts... of a real child (since you obviously need it spelled out for you).