Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

Full Version: Our Long National Nightmare is Almost Over!
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Quote:Since you didn't care enough to vote, you telling us about what you think the election meant is meaningless twaddle.

Uh no. That doesn't follow at all. Everyone has the option to not vote, particularly if neither candidate doesn't suit them. Just voting because you think it's your moral duty is meaningless.
(Jul 18, 2025 04:41 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:Since you didn't care enough to vote, you telling us about what you think the election meant is meaningless twaddle.

Uh no. That doesn't follow at all. Everyone has the option to not vote, particularly if neither candidate doesn't suit them. Just voting because you think it's your moral duty is meaningless.

Not voting literally means you decided you were irrelevant... by your own inaction. If you weren't irrelevant, you'd at least go and cast a protest vote by either voting against the one you disliked most or throwing away your vote on an independent candidate. Either way, you could then at least say you cared enough to matter. Apathy is not an argument, no matter how many people are apathetic.
No it doesn't. It means neither candidate suited you and so you chose not to vote. There is no moral imperative to vote when the system can't provide you with a desireable candidate. To vote just to vote is to be a dumb sheep.
Never said there was a moral duty or imperative to vote. Quit all your dumbass straw men.
Doesn't change the fact that you choosing not to vote is literally your choice to be irrelevant.
And it's beyond ridiculous for you to assume you can speak for all the other irrelevant people.
Quote:Doesn't change the fact that you choosing not to vote is literally your choice to be irrelevant.

I don't care to do anything for a system that can't even provide us with a sensible candidate. It's my right and I will exercise it as I see fit. Your priggish moralizing about how awful a person I am notwithstanding. That's pretty much all you harp on anyway. Get a life.
Yes, you absolutely do have the right to make yourself irrelevant. But the consequence of making yourself irrelevant is that your opinion on the subject ceases to matter.
Quote:But the consequence of making yourself irrelevant is that your opinion on the subject ceases to matter.

Fortunately for all of us you don't get to make up the rules about whose view is relevant or irrelevant.
I didn't, you did. When you make yourself irrelevant, you don't get to unilaterally decide that your opinion matters.
The choice was yours. Live with it.
Quote:I didn't, you did.

Nope. You're the one claiming my views are irrelevant just because I didn't vote. Which is totally false. The very fact that 90 million Americans didn't makes their views highly relevant. What happened that so many people stayed at home? Perhaps the bipartisan system is no longer workable. What kind of candidate would we vote for? And what changes need to be made to enable that? Politics is a lot more than who you last voted for.
You can't demand that your opinion is somehow relevant. It isn't. Deal with it.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9