Jun 4, 2025 09:28 PM
Here's one. Dr. Jane Goodall weighing in on Bigfoot and other similar cryptids around the world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ukvQfUlAog
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ukvQfUlAog
Jun 4, 2025 09:28 PM
Jun 5, 2025 01:55 AM
Jun 5, 2025 06:19 PM
Jun 5, 2025 07:30 PM
Theoretical physicist Freeman Dyson:
“It is remarkable that mind enters into our awareness of nature on two separate levels. At the highest level, the level of human consciousness, our minds are somehow directly aware of the complicated flow of electrical and chemical patterns in our brains. At the lowest level, the level of single atoms and electrons, the mind of an observer is again involved in the description of events. Between lies the level of molecular biology, where mechanical models are adequate and mind appears to be irrelevant. But I, as a physicist, cannot help suspecting that there is a logical connection between the two ways in which mind appears in my universe. I cannot help thinking that our awareness of our own brains has something to do with the process which we call "observation" in atomic physics. That is to say, I think our consciousness is not just a passive epiphenomenon carried along by the chemical events in our brains, but is an active agent forcing the molecular complexes to make choices between one quantum state and another. In other words, mind is already inherent in every electron, and the processes of human consciousness differ only in degree but not in kind from the processes of choice between quantum states which we call "chance" when they are made by electrons.”
― Freeman Dyson
“It is remarkable that mind enters into our awareness of nature on two separate levels. At the highest level, the level of human consciousness, our minds are somehow directly aware of the complicated flow of electrical and chemical patterns in our brains. At the lowest level, the level of single atoms and electrons, the mind of an observer is again involved in the description of events. Between lies the level of molecular biology, where mechanical models are adequate and mind appears to be irrelevant. But I, as a physicist, cannot help suspecting that there is a logical connection between the two ways in which mind appears in my universe. I cannot help thinking that our awareness of our own brains has something to do with the process which we call "observation" in atomic physics. That is to say, I think our consciousness is not just a passive epiphenomenon carried along by the chemical events in our brains, but is an active agent forcing the molecular complexes to make choices between one quantum state and another. In other words, mind is already inherent in every electron, and the processes of human consciousness differ only in degree but not in kind from the processes of choice between quantum states which we call "chance" when they are made by electrons.”
― Freeman Dyson
Jun 5, 2025 08:17 PM
(Jun 5, 2025 01:55 AM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]Theoretical physicist Michio Kaku on uaps...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gby0Z_SsLu4
So MR is now a fan of Tucker Carlson.
Jun 5, 2025 09:26 PM
Who is Tucker Carlson?
Jun 5, 2025 09:58 PM
You're not fooling anyone.
Jun 6, 2025 09:13 PM
Jun 7, 2025 02:51 AM
“My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”― Nikola Tesla
Jun 7, 2025 02:53 AM
Is there anyone more open- minded than a skeptic?
AI …..
AI …..
Quote: Skeptics can be open-minded because skepticism, at its core, involves questioning and demanding evidence before accepting a claim. It's not a stance of outright denial, but rather a critical evaluation that is open to changing perspectives when presented with compelling evidence. Being a skeptic encourages a thorough examination of information and a willingness to consider alternative viewpoints, ultimately fostering open-mindedness.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Skepticism and Critical Thinking:
Skeptics are known for their critical thinking skills, which involve questioning assumptions and thoroughly evaluating evidence. This process helps identify and mitigate cognitive biases, further promoting open-mindedness.
Open to Evidence:
Skepticism is not about being closed off to new ideas, but rather about requiring evidence before accepting them. Once evidence is provided and is convincing, a skeptic is likely to accept the claim, demonstrating an open-minded approach.
Differentiating Skepticism from Denial:
A key distinction is that when evidence is presented and rejected, skepticism transitions into denial, which is a closed-minded approach. Genuine skepticism involves a willingness to be persuaded by evidence.
Openness to New Information:
Open-minded individuals are willing to listen to others, consider their perspectives, and engage in critical thinking before forming an opinion. This includes being open to the possibility of changing their mind in light of new information.
Benefits of Being Open-Minded and Skeptical:
This combination allows individuals to engage in more meaningful discussions, explore a wider range of ideas, and make more informed decisions based on evidence rather than preconceived notions.