Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

Quote:You’re done MR, absolutely the worst spokesperson that any group of people could ask for.

Whew! Well that's a relief, seeing that I only ever speak for myself at all times.

(May 28, 2025 04:00 AM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]

Quote:Again, learn to read. No one said "no buoyancy." I said lost buoyancy. In the context of it still floating, anyone with two brain cells to rub together should be able to suss out that "lost buoyancy" doesn't mean "no buoyancy." Not sure if you're really that stupid or just that intent on erecting straw men.

No dumbass. If a balloon loses its buoyancy it can't float at all. And you know this. You just fucked up again and have no way out other than to backpedal and deny and nitpick. This is the typical tedious bullshit you resort to when losing the argument.

Apparently, you're such a moron that you don't even understand that buoyancy is not a binary state. There are degrees of buoyancy... which any child knows, playing with a balloon that's lost half its helium knows. How do you think hot air balloons navigate? If floating is all or nothing, how do you imagine that works, dipshit?

Quote:

Quote:Yes, people who watch edited films are very often mistaken about what really happened.

The same video that showed the sphere flying around and coming to a complete standstill and then plummeting into the trees shows one of them approaching it and picking it up and carrying it off. Nobody is making a mistake about anything because it's all on video. And you simply have no evidence it was a mistake or a hoax or whatever you are claiming it to be.

You have no idea if it's the same video. There are many cuts and edits.
Until someone cuts open and demonstrates it cannot possibly be terrestrial... the default null hypothesis is that it has no relation to extraterrestrials.
Quit trying to shift the burden, moron.

Simulated opening of alien orb..
"Ooo look, there's a...."
<Thwack>
"Ouch."
"Xygrum ikklot kakarto riixl vortok niphilo"

I'd be more inclined to think once they are finished playing around with it and find its legs, they can cook themselves up a barbecue.

Here's a good well-balanced "deep dive" into the Buga Sphere and what we know about it so far..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tpiavQdk6o

Why would they put two obviously different spheres in the vid launch pic, even if one with the cutaway is an artist’s rendition? The joint is different along with the symbols. Makes it appear as if the sphere(s) belong to an assortment of similar metal balls. Maybe an experiment in gullibility that we’ll read about later.

The artist's rendition is obviously just showing what the sphere looks like on the inside. Just like any science website might do. No diabolical intent to deceive..

(May 29, 2025 06:44 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]The artist's rendition is obviously just showing what the sphere looks like on the inside. Just like any science website might do. No diabolical intent to deceive..

Ya, sure. I think someone who anticipated they’d need a second sphere to perpetuate the hoax, got it wrong. Nothing diabolical just stupid mistake.

Could be a photo of a prototype cutaway cropped to project a fake image but too bad it doesn’t match the sphere in news article. A clear indication that there’s more than one sphere.

Doing a crossword puzzle today, I came across this clue: "The inquiry of a true believer."
The answer: "Ufology"

(May 29, 2025 10:27 PM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]Doing a crossword puzzle today, I came across this clue: "The inquiry of a true believer."
The answer: "Ufology"

You probably covered some other branch of parapsychology with that coincidence….lol