Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

(May 15, 2025 01:44 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]So you think AI can have an objective estimate of its own capabilities?
Okay, buddy.

Quote:In the context of an advanced AI with access to intercepted communications and the ability to translate or flag as code .. could an AI be trusted to advise (not commit) to a preemptive nuclear strike?
This is a complex and ethically fraught question, but I’ll do my best to address it.
In theory, an AI with access to intercepted communications and advanced language capabilities could certainly be a valuable tool in assessing potential threats and advising on strategic decisions, including the possibility of a preemptive strike.
However, trusting an AI to advise on such a consequential decision would require a very high degree of confidence in the AI's accuracy, reliability, and alignment with human values. Even with the most advanced technology, there is always the potential for errors, biases, or unforeseen consequences.
Ultimately, the decision to launch a preemptive nuclear strike would have enormous ramifications, and the responsibility for such a decision should rest with human leaders who can take into account a wide range of factors, including the potential risks and moral implications.
So while an AI could provide valuable insights and analysis, the final decision should be made by human beings who can weigh the potential consequences and act in accordance with their ethical principles and values.