(Aug 24, 2024 05:58 PM)Magical Realist Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:Very easy to confuse those, which is exactly why the wiki points that out. If Curiel were a member of the latter, it would definitely bring into question his impartiality on any case involving the border or illegal immigration.
So what? It doesn't change the fact that Trump is demonstrably a racist idiot.
Since there's a reasonable explanation for why someone would assume Judge Curiel couldn't be impartial, you're going to have to do a lot better than TDS ad homs.
Quote:Quote:Some illegal aliens from Mexico are proven rapists. That's a fact.
Some American citizens are proven rapists too.
That's a ridiculous argument. That's like saying, "since murders happen, we shouldn't do anything to stop more murders."
There being American rapists doesn't mean we should allow more rapists into the country illegally, which is what Biden-Harris have been doing... proven by convicted illegal alien rapists.
Quote:"he said that Mexican immigrants were “bringing drugs. And they’re bringing crime. And they’re rapists.” When MSNBC asked him about it the next day, he reiterated: “We have drug dealers coming across, we have rapists, we have murderers, we have killers.”
All of that is a fact. Nowhere does he say every single one is a criminal. That's just your TDS straw man.
The fact is that illegals are coming in without any vetting, so there's no way to tell how many are criminals.
Quote:"research indicates that immigrants commit less crimes than U.S.-born people.
You're conflating legal immigrants with illegal aliens again. It's intellectually dishonest.
Quote:They found that undocumented immigrants were 37.1% less likely to be convicted of a crime.
How could you possibly have a percentage when we don't even know the actual number of illegal aliens in the US.
That means they're making up bullshit. Not that I'd ever accuse you or the left of understanding basic things like math.
Quote:Quote:The "good people on both sides" is a proven lie that is taken out of context,
No it isn't. He said it about white supremacists. That they were "very fine people." No context changes the meaning of that.
If you insist on ignoring reality, that's your own mental illness.
"Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
...
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists.
- https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/...s-remarks/
Quote:Quote:Many African countries are objectively shit holes.
Which now makes you a disgusting racist.
If you're unable to objectively compare the standard of living and conditions of different countries, again, that's your own mental illness.
Again, you assuming majority black countries cannot be held to the same standards is objectively racist. You know, as opposed to your unsupported ad homs.
Quote:Quote:Telling people who repeatedly say they hate this country that they can "go back" to the country of their heritage is not racism.
"Country of their heritage"? WTH does that mean?
You do know that America is a relatively young country, right? And that most people here, especially white Europeans, have a heritage that originates elsewhere, right?
Or are you a complete imbecile?
Quote:"Go back to where you came from" is a racist or xenophobic epithet which is used in many countries, and it is mainly used to target immigrants and falsely presumed immigrants.
Your irrational TDS just makes you incapable of understanding anything but the least charitable interpretations of everything said.
You do know that the principle of charity is a sign of intellectual honesty, right? What am I saying, of course you don't. You've repeatedly demonstrated, in this thread and across your entire history on forums, that you have zero working understanding of the concept of intellectual honesty.
Quit being such a hateful, racist moron.