Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

Full Version: Daniel Dennett deflates consciousness
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
Just as life itself can't be reduced to some proto-life property inherent in matter, I doubt that consciousness can be reduced to some proto-experiential property of matter. There is an emergent quality to it that defies explanation in terms of composition. That's not to say there may be more explanatory power in terms of consciousness's relations to the outer world, as an interactive and information-gathering process.
But I don't place much stock in a panpsychic reductionism to some material property. Too much of consciousness, as with life also, arises out of the structured matrix of itself and its world. It actually is emergent, and so may never satisfactorily have a clear and formulaic explanation in terms of its physical elements.
(Feb 25, 2024 05:05 AM)Syne Wrote: [ -> ]If we take pansychism seriously, then consciousness is an accumulation of some property of matter that increases with complexity. So it's not simply about the mass, and things like the Earth are in no way conscious, as its complexity is no greater than its constituents. If so, consciousness would be inherent in matter but only reach a crucial, effective agency as an emergent result of complexity.
Pages: 1 2 3