Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

Full Version: Research finds no gender bias in academic science + WHO's pseudoscience problem
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Research finds no gender bias in academic science
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/facu...ic-science

EXCERPT: Reviewing decades of studies, researchers with “adversarial” perspectives conclude that tenure-track women and men in STEM receive comparable grant funding, journal acceptances and recommendation letters—and that women have an edge over men in hiring... (MORE - details)


The World Health Organization has a pseudoscience problem (i.e., soul)
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/critic...ce-problem

INTRO: It is not technically theirs, but it appears in the glossary of one of their many official documents. The soul, according to the WHO, is derived from the astral organization, which is another term they have had to define. The astral organization, you see, is distinct from the etheric organization. That same document, coming out of the world’s foremost authority on global health, mentions such esoteric concepts as rhythmical embrocation, a type of energy healing that involves rhythmic strokes on the body.

At a time when the WHO is accused by conspiracy theorists of being in the pocket of Bill Gates and using mass vaccination as a nefarious scheme to control humanity, it’s easy to forget that there are genuine reasons to criticize the WHO. Its mission to ensure everyone on Earth has access to healthcare has led to its legitimization of prescientific belief systems and of thoroughly debunked practices. The WHO doesn’t stop at validating these pseudomedicines; it wants them integrated with evidence-based medicine... (MORE - details)

RELATED (wikipedia): indigenous science