Mar 30, 2023 02:29 PM
Noticing the obligatory leftist SF brigade pillorying dished out to a newcomer who imagined it might be ok to suggest all is not well with the official 9-11 story...
Annoyed with the stupid arguments of a 'truther' whose sole line of argument was about the tilt of the upper collapsing section of WTC 2, I jumped in a now long forgotten thread.
Pointing out one singularly crucial fact that demolished the official narrative. Copious evidence for molten steel - lots of it. Beneath the rubble of what were WTC towers 1, 2, & 7.
Something physically impossible if massive amounts of thermite/thermate cutter charges were not the source of said molten steel/iron.
Nothing less than blast furnace temperatures can generate it - certainly way beyond the ability of relatively tepid office fires, or the initial jet fuel fires that blew outwards in fireballs that essentially exhausted in seconds after the respective impacts at WTC 1 then 2.
Just one poster then foolishly challenged me (he just lurks here ever since I joined up). Actually suggesting the collapse of WTC 1 & 2 magically generated the clearly evident molten steel/iron (after earlier claiming it was only molten aluminum 'everybody saw that day'). Said molten steel/iron reported to still exist in pockets weeks even months after 9-11.
It's hard for someone like me to understand mindsets that can swallow an official narrative denying or simply ignoring that glaring issue.
Quite apart from many other 9-11 official narrative absurdities MSM still promulgates. But hey you won't get flack that way.
Annoyed with the stupid arguments of a 'truther' whose sole line of argument was about the tilt of the upper collapsing section of WTC 2, I jumped in a now long forgotten thread.
Pointing out one singularly crucial fact that demolished the official narrative. Copious evidence for molten steel - lots of it. Beneath the rubble of what were WTC towers 1, 2, & 7.
Something physically impossible if massive amounts of thermite/thermate cutter charges were not the source of said molten steel/iron.
Nothing less than blast furnace temperatures can generate it - certainly way beyond the ability of relatively tepid office fires, or the initial jet fuel fires that blew outwards in fireballs that essentially exhausted in seconds after the respective impacts at WTC 1 then 2.
Just one poster then foolishly challenged me (he just lurks here ever since I joined up). Actually suggesting the collapse of WTC 1 & 2 magically generated the clearly evident molten steel/iron (after earlier claiming it was only molten aluminum 'everybody saw that day'). Said molten steel/iron reported to still exist in pockets weeks even months after 9-11.
It's hard for someone like me to understand mindsets that can swallow an official narrative denying or simply ignoring that glaring issue.
Quite apart from many other 9-11 official narrative absurdities MSM still promulgates. But hey you won't get flack that way.