Scivillage.com Casual Discussion Science Forum

Full Version: WHO to U.S.: Stop hogging vaccines with booster shot excuse
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/08/...-hates-it/

EXCERPT: US officials on Wednesday formally announced plans to offer COVID-19 vaccine booster shots to Americans—and the plans are already under fire from experts at the World Health Organization.

US officials are recommending that all Americans vaccinated with two doses of an mRNA vaccine (either the Moderna or Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine) get a third booster dose of the same vaccine eight months after receiving their second dose. As such, boosters will be rolled out based on the order in which people were initially offered vaccines, i.e., with frontline health workers, nursing home residents, and other seniors at the front of the line.

[...] Just hours earlier on Wednesday, the World Health Organization held its own press briefing. Its experts minced no words on why they think the booster rollout is a bad idea.

"The reality is right now, today, if we think about this in terms of an analogy, we're planning to hand out extra life jackets to people who already have life jackets while we're leaving other people to drown without a single life jacket. That's the reality," Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO's Health Emergencies Programme, said at the briefing. "The science is not certain on [boosters]," he added. "There are clearly more data to collect. But the fundamental, ethical reality is [that] we're handing out second life jackets while leaving millions and millions of people without anything to protect them."

The WHO's sharp criticism of the US plan is no surprise. Earlier this month, the United Nations agency called for a moratorium on booster shots until at least the end of September, which would provide more time to try to vaccinate at least 10 percent of every country worldwide. In making the announcement, WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus noted that high-income countries had administered 100 doses per 100 people, while low-income countries had only administered 1.5 doses per 100 people due to inequitable access to supplies.

But the argument for equal distribution of vaccines worldwide isn't merely a moral one; it's also in the best interest of public health globally. While the pandemic coronavirus is able to freely spread among unvaccinated people anywhere, it will have new opportunities in each infected person to mutate and generate more variants.

[...] In their defense of the booster rollout, US officials noted that the country has already donated more doses than any other country in the world. (MORE - missing details)
Why are they concerned if there are still ''so many'' who allegedly refuse to get the vaccine? Can't have a surplus of vaccines, and be hogging them, at the same time. lol
(Aug 20, 2021 05:52 PM)Leigha Wrote: [ -> ]Why are they concerned if there are still ''so many'' who allegedly refuse to get the vaccine? Can't have a surplus of vaccines, and be hogging them, at the same time. lol

To be fair, having a surplus could actually be evidence of hoarding.

But the US government is only accountable to the US citizens, not the entire world. So their first responsibility is to ensure the safety of their own, just like any other country is to their own. Poorer countries will always fall behind, even with charity.
I can sorta see both sides of this.

If I was in a poor country in Africa or wherever, a country dependent on the charity of other nations for whatever vaccines we may or may not get, I might resent rich countries performing seemingly unnecessary and gratuitous additional innoculations of already vaccinated people, while my people and my country get no vaccines at all.

But that being said, it's not like vaccines are a naturally occurring natural resource that's being hogged by a few favored countries. If it wasn't for those countries, there would be no vaccine at all.
The pharmaceutical companies could always donate to those countries. You know, since they already have all these lucrative contracts with first-world countries.

Seems like people who demand others to help are the least likely to volunteer to help themselves.