Article Nearly 50% of environmentalists abandoned Twitter following Musk’s takeover

[C C]

https://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evol...23)00189-1

PRESS RELEASE: In October 2022, Elon Musk purchased Twitter (recently renamed X), which had previously served as the leading social media platform for environmental discourse. Since then, reports a team of researchers in the journal Trends in Ecology and Evolution on August 15, there has been a mass exodus of environmental users on the platform—a phenomenon that could have serious implications for public communication surrounding topics like biodiversity, climate change, and natural disaster recovery.

“Twitter has been the dominant social media platform for diverse environmental interests to communicate and organize around advocacy goals, exchange ideas and research, and new opportunities for collaboration,” writes the US-based research team of biologists and environmental consultants.

The team studied a group of 380,000 “environmentally-oriented users,” which included a wide range of people from the conservation community who had actively participated in pro-environmental discussions surrounding topics like climate change and biodiversity on Twitter. Users were considered “active” if they posted on the platform at least once within a 15-day period.

The researchers found that in the 6-month period after Musk took over Twitter, only 52.5% of these environmental users were still actively using Twitter—a substantially larger drop-off rate than other “comparable online communities,” including users who discuss general politics on the platform.

“There is currently no platform equivalent to Twitter,” the team writes. “Thus, any changes in engagement by environmentally-minded users raises serious questions about where to track discourse about environmental conservation and how to mobilize pro-environmental segments of the public.”

Going forward, the authors call upon researchers to take an active role in the transition towards different modes of environmental communication—whether that be advocating for change within Twitter to help make it a useful platform for environmentalists again or collectively switching to another platform like Mastodon or Threads. They also point to resources like the Coalition for Independent Technology Research, which bring people together to voice concerns to Twitter representatives and policymakers.

“The future of Twitter as a platform for outreach and research is uncertain,” write the authors. “We need to create collaborations across industry, the non-profit sector, and academia to track public engagement with the environment across social media platforms for the benefit of primary research, applied environmental conservation, and climate mitigation.”

[Yazata]

This looks to me like another indication of the growing left-politization of science.

What are "environmentalists"? The quotes in the post above seem to make no distinction between environmental scientists and environmental activists. There's talk about "primary research", but did anyone publish actual primary research on twitter, as opposed to publishing it in more conventional journals? How could they, with twitter's old 150 character limits on the length of tweets?

X has relaxed that limit and it's now effectively unlimited for paid blue-check X members. So shouldn't real scientists be applauding that move?

The real underlying complaint is that X is no longer the left's exclusive playhouse, from which conservatives were excluded if they disagreed with any of the chosen "narratives".

Environmental activists are still free to post whatever they like on X, except now somebody might disagree with it! Horrors!! Run away! Run away!

Disagreement isn't tolerated in their classrooms or in their favorite journals after all! They just don't know how to respond.

This is what "science" has come to in our brave new world. Something increasingly reminiscent of medieval theology.

[confused2]

This looks to me like another indication of the growing left-politization of science.

What are "environmentalists"? The quotes in the post above seem to make no distinction between environmental scientists and environmental activists. There's talk about "primary research", but did anyone publish actual primary research on twitter, as opposed to publishing it in more conventional journals? How could they, with twitter's old 150 character limits on the length of tweets?

X has relaxed that limit and it's now effectively unlimited for paid blue-check X members. So shouldn't real scientists be applauding that move?

The real underlying complaint is that X is no longer the left's exclusive playhouse, from which conservatives were excluded if they disagreed with any of the chosen "narratives".

Environmental activists are still free to post whatever they like on X, except now somebody might disagree with it! Horrors!! Run away! Run away!

Disagreement isn't tolerated in their classrooms or in their favorite journals after all! They just don't know how to respond.

This is what "science" has come to in our brave new world. Something increasingly reminiscent of medieval theology.

In fairness Elon probably has a bigger CO2 footprint than most. Could be more like vegetarians finding themselves in the middle of a cattle ranch - and they ran away. I don't know but it is a possibility.