Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Article  An easy way to solve the problem of garbage in scientific journals

#1
C C Offline
https://bigthink.com/the-present/double-...emic-bias/

KEY POINTS: Peer review is the process for screening scientific knowledge, but it has plenty of warts. A recent paper looked at whether more anonymity improves the process by reducing bias. Hiding researchers’ names and universities from reviewers appears to produce a fairer outcome.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Article We need fewer scientists & fewer journals + Flood of fake science spurs closures C C 0 39 May 15, 2024 04:46 PM
Last Post: C C
  How journals & academic enablers are corrupting reporting on crop biotechnology C C 0 99 Feb 2, 2024 04:33 AM
Last Post: C C
  Article WHO promotes quackery again + AI use seeps into academic journals C C 1 90 Aug 26, 2023 11:39 PM
Last Post: confused2
  Article Why science & its journals should remain free of ideology: an example from "Nature" C C 0 70 Mar 23, 2023 02:50 PM
Last Post: C C
  Fashionable nonsense of med journals + Phthalates over-hype + Gibberish book chapter C C 0 65 Oct 24, 2021 10:52 PM
Last Post: C C
  Scientists move to strip offensive names from journals, prizes, and more C C 5 267 Jul 8, 2020 09:49 PM
Last Post: Yazata
  Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability C C 0 222 Jul 27, 2018 03:12 PM
Last Post: C C
  Skepticism takes many forms + Predatory journals are also shameless C C 0 337 Dec 20, 2017 07:10 PM
Last Post: C C
  Predatory Journals Hit By 'Star Wars' Sting C C 0 332 Jul 25, 2017 09:36 PM
Last Post: C C
  Dog sits on editorial boards of 7 journals + Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Pseudoscience C C 0 386 May 29, 2017 04:01 AM
Last Post: C C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)